IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 21 August 2014 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4FC1A0694 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qAdGVHhkF09j for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FDB1A0689 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q58so9738220wes.35 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wCumBAjkO9C0U4SE3sfLad461Juv1zalCAe56oWTNOA=; b=R91K6uoogQo0BdYZp0gBcCM+oNkEeiq0r17LZhfIT3S5jsS04LTB1SvEkvPA7YETml xKRK0C3qh600LSpHtrXCqNeyF0Ml4AimnkKUeBQ31AsrNvBNs8mRklAHkMI29OG82rnn 9iS0fKA5g3VKJ37as0cw8g4txASu+qX5BJHKtk+oBNaAnDaFVKG3pVwnQvkbhRkruv3c lFR9eOm94KFO1Myiw4GFolnB6GX3cN6XyoUV+PThwIoipYY/d5nnWpXbnUhrNa5/RbCX tFe0yr1reRs8CgzHAaAjlCECz50++QYz/SAHe1Yabl72kF0Wh1Hb4j4yjUw+dF8KdFdh 4Gdg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.63.37 with SMTP id d5mr609221wjs.92.1408649787131; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.6.229 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxsT9Vdm0=tjk9WsLAH4ekbAizgyjm--168TrOf8UAYGZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9kkMCZT1XW4LLaJ4Nq2DbrxD59cYnjLo5JXn9fjEb8pyamaQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D41CDC3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAKz0y8zycsyr9m4BA=-8xOaWkU+Sog5Mbz7K-oN3woqi++mVzg@mail.gmail.com> <53F451CF.10705@alvestrand.no> <001b01cfbc94$fccd5310$f667f930$@co.in> <CAKz0y8zNM3rc3XC6JqrK+d4hXiT5TomhNM+W2twg0+-83-pFow@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUnfB5bskH4zWRfBMdHbSoqftV5Fo_GEXoLt9XCH9Tt_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsT9Vdm0=tjk9WsLAH4ekbAizgyjm--168TrOf8UAYGZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:36:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXUpibu8kWYmbJJJT2J3RNGXFV8LbceLijgG0U-pGY2xQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/VgIfmn_XBXzQaeaYjSmdkLZiLZI
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:36:30 -0000

On 21 August 2014 11:25, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> wrote:
> All entities receive peer transport information from elsewhere, including
> gateways running ICE-Lite. Does it mean all of them need to perform consent?

That's the logical conclusion, yes.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email