IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 29 August 2014 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91101A0739 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fnRI3XyuQRLT for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B3751A08A7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id p9so3006595lbv.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UTu8oLLtVkup9GWvfZc8oMTGhEPziYhgpDMJ4WqxsRA=; b=mRIZ/Be+RTTn+xz9fL5J9Z4JClZ9nN/nYeBWu0ECDzxa4RQfabWFheTgQfqyyqeKws UGqd6VipfW/v0OT6MLayndXQ1sRxSRMol1t9qge9vcPJ/hTvxTBBMs4UNYh1qvRAwamJ WhIdxqGkpoc5iz5jYSv4jc0VqNYsQfdZ2WwHc2LJCNylZzy79NrokWEOvaMOqdN381J4 RLhhaQ+ggvp55e7glirLb/9H/Ult/mVatyuspXnFAJp0HepWaHLLEdf4EazU02SzfLE+ MOFZ+gFlycEdHLs3+gE2I1WhvevygVhOfUl4VJPMFhbMeU0i8C1FGs5GBsyiq04ghwj/ JfvA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.87.81 with SMTP id v17mr12669212laz.17.1409335723531; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.166.75 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D431848@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CA+9kkMCZT1XW4LLaJ4Nq2DbrxD59cYnjLo5JXn9fjEb8pyamaQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D41CDC3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAKz0y8zycsyr9m4BA=-8xOaWkU+Sog5Mbz7K-oN3woqi++mVzg@mail.gmail.com> <53F451CF.10705@alvestrand.no> <001b01cfbc94$fccd5310$f667f930$@co.in> <CAKz0y8zNM3rc3XC6JqrK+d4hXiT5TomhNM+W2twg0+-83-pFow@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUnfB5bskH4zWRfBMdHbSoqftV5Fo_GEXoLt9XCH9Tt_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsT9Vdm0=tjk9WsLAH4ekbAizgyjm--168TrOf8UAYGZw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXUpibu8kWYmbJJJT2J3RNGXFV8LbceLijgG0U-pGY2xQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKz0y8z_oBf2efavfOLgzqE1R8sZstefZ1tvwwJLkhRskXZERQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxsSqA=cki_fSaqAPP0GXCv_kHr6571C+K9ze4ceHCGYdQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D427B68@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <D01D6B42.104F8%rmohanr@cisco.com> <009001cfbe4f$6b92f280$42b8d780$@co.in> <CAKz0y8y3=0_-jwWiviR_Uj6tSq75NEq92Ocergc_NvFk2h_72Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxugaPq=cLppPUqT8CUADV-E2zDMcz6m3sUgKOnK-TdQfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU6kv+=jQuxj4Ci-zYW9mHEfJ=6jqqrdqDTopPN06-kgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxu=9X2um+EebZzp3isY-R_-NqyOgH+bWj55+_Q8qXfrqg@mail.gmail.com> <E1FE4C082A89A246A11D7F32A95A17828E52F5F0@US70UWXCHMBA02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <CABkgnnUNk=QMFtGH3ZvD0V3B6OwSjcsOmaQU5+gcQ5wg9yo7aA@mail.gmail.com> <E1FE4C082A89A246A11D7F32A95A17828E532F45@US70UWXCHMBA02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAKz0y8wS93GbA-HrW9mMr=RsrTFVXTsV1=F14enNwYJ2Grfbnw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVGe_CPHrh7VL_H0STs7x3COW1w54xu=hsZSD=j-vHqCA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D431848@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:08:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUDgM7Kgn1EAU9tzGFfYwH6LbuOnAbjdB7yLDm67q00XA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/HNBWfc6bWUoQaePG63XeZ1ndNZo
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 18:08:47 -0000

On 29 August 2014 00:20, Christer Holmberg
<christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
> As long as the WebRTC entity supporting full ICE does not assume that the remote WebRTC entity (e.g. a WebRTC gateway) also supports full ICE (read: won't perform consent freshness).

The only way that ICE uses the checks that a remote peer generates is
to populate peer reflexive candidates.  It doesn't apply to consent.
I think we're safe there.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email