IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Separating stream manipulation from the SDP loudness (Re: Proposed Plan for Usage of SDP and RTP)

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 11 March 2013 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890F421F84CD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.774
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.774 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OOgQ+SFp2bKd for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C0B21F84AB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C52B39E1B7; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:39:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sOwOomeoYoHg; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:39:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:b4fd:eac0:98eb:c482] (unknown [IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:b4fd:eac0:98eb:c482]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A58739E1AD; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:39:32 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <513DD082.9090701@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:39:30 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
References: <CD5D3F35.B22B%robin@hookflash.com> <B9549E2E-6E68-4F34-A9C0-1F050285A70A@acmepacket.com> <CABkgnnXCio-Dw7dN5yfSjeRf3wG2oWow_M2mU-Y49TedSAPQmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBDyN6CFTix3W9qWgC1T0O36t4SajL3hMXaHOdkat-p5TY_xA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMLdEkFZq5rMOY0texKb4DtFQ-O86JkC17kJihxv6Dj8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBDyN6mM-rT315uSbeTQfKuCiVwsEDhi7Q6DEbt8pjiJ_4i6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2nz=NZb=UaevUSS7GRSBpvn-v9_=QHz6iddnZzyx5-TSQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUETwfY7ZvaXO_1Bq8gs8pOTgALQE8FiimrUX7sfuEpDsw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2kcEHcz11LOYYMZ3-nv2PYQKu=z6M=dsQ_H5JuR8ND7hQ@mail.gmail.com> <513B5D98.2070601@alvestrand.no> <CAHp8n2n8xMEYMLKNbRT73=SSvJ9ku8b_KKL+AqJyx9F0R8_GqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMRcRGSat2FM7KMZiJnB634zKXyM0s0uAgVeRqbBjHkFzpcBFw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHp8n2k8yrSSOhj3bQ0kKWq9YniBum6BNZwDci2YXbHV4CXJdg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp8n2k8yrSSOhj3bQ0kKWq9YniBum6BNZwDci2YXbHV4CXJdg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Separating stream manipulation from the SDP loudness (Re: Proposed Plan for Usage of SDP and RTP)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:39:37 -0000

On 03/11/2013 12:02 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> What are the special scenarios?
> (Noting that this is likely the wrong list for this topic...)

One that I've heard mention is if the remote gateway requires stuff in 
the SDP that the browser knows nothing about. (I've never encountered 
this in practice, but it wouldn't surprise me if it happens).

In that case, the application would be written especially for 
communicating with that remote gateway.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email