Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs
Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Fri, 01 November 2013 15:15 UTC
Return-Path: <emcho@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D72411E83A1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.733
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.733 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wRAf1-RRU308 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com (mail-pb0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B127311E8163 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id rq13so308197pbb.20 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5NmvNHyihtgAGgKpIh8TuaKMHnv55zcruZQu0Y3KR2U=; b=B7pHOdvbXSv/X8NjOKmp1CczqyHeTvsDLk3tvcdoOYe6NBq5NNqe3MR9L/PctWAYsZ 90bdayntIm/N9paZlAmhQ811x5T5OHzp2B061ZahFZfo0/esU8Iq72J9BNoTIlQy5XVk LIF131GSuSQ/JQaWO1rsCa5CQEJpFDFFZZDndQd8q9uaTpEgt/2wJHlh/OPxjyupOH9Y 0ZZEw1pqh9Nyyi7ORxEbgnsT1K0sPs0aDAv7dORHDc3aDz/F/MQ1pc1Y0MOYNjZrMczz jK7EG6NSpIG5wbQ1hGjLh6LlfPcSJ0yh+9Dgq7ANUrHuB7hFrWzZxh3CR5+LXhACJ6O+ RQFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmEqw4zvCjpRFYHwAICc/Kfi2CbszN48nYytTqBKaeMcq4fbFuvUTTbYnDs+3eDpP5EKzxn
X-Received: by 10.66.123.5 with SMTP id lw5mr3629717pab.83.1383318895519; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com [2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v4sm11375312pbq.31.2013.11.01.08.14.54 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id lj1so4155546pab.22 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.68.164.165 with SMTP id yr5mr3720017pbb.146.1383318894868; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 08:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.191.163 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0C5BA1@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <527147FF.5010506@nostrum.com> <C72DB04F-F363-45A9-A51F-31900037C239@vipadia.com> <C81F0BD3-F5E6-4E1A-955D-16D55E698BD1@edvina.net> <5272C6C8.3070006@gmail.com> <CABcZeBM6T0a9iLHVujzAiwFi5X5=S0oNK=xR3=FkHM2wi5bngQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgTwJwf27PuxGhhZAZgDN2jguxhNFBNPeJC4W1dwd5jzYA@mail.gmail.com> <5273A746.4060504@viagenie.ca> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0C5BA1@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:14:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPvvaaJjHDHaocbAs+WR7pbqjECwpcs8bT4M_GgCwtFFzNqdVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:15:09 -0000
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:27 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > > That ownership means they are also take responsibility for any of the liabilities arising > from defective code they so distribute. I see no reason why Cisco would want to do > that under anything but a controlled evironment, which would have its own set of > non-trivial costs. They could have the same by distributing x264 binaries that they have compiled by themselves. One of the things in the Cisco grand, that sound a bit incoherent to me is their declared will on building a healthy open source community around their implementation. Specifically, what baffles me is that there is already a very well oiled implementation that does a lot more than just baseline. That implementation already has a vibrant community, significant popularity and, again, it sounds like it would be considerably superior to what Cisco are planning on rolling out in OpenH264. In addition to wondering at the pure waste of resources (with a casual reference to NIH), potential contributors could legitimately ask "why would we contribute to your project when you made the exact opposite choice when faced with the decision?". Emil -- https://jitsi.org
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Leon Geyser
- [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Richard Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Simon Perreault
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Chris Wendt
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs Cullen Jennings