Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs

Adam Roach <> Wed, 30 October 2013 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D76521E8179 for <>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.453
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.453 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.147, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OR77drIKRksH for <>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BB621E8151 for <>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r9UJHBum029976 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:17:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:17:06 -0500
From: Adam Roach <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leon Geyser <>
References: <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass ( is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:17:58 -0000

On 10/30/13 14:08, Leon Geyser wrote:
> Playback of H.264 should be supported on all Windows Phones, but 
> encoding looks like it is device specific.
> It may or may not return H.264, but in reality most Windows Phones 
> probably do support it. I am not sure.

Given that Microsoft has been pushing pretty hard to make H.264 the 
WebRTC MTi video codec, I doubt they would neglect to support it in 
their own platform.

> I don't think it would be possible to download and use the Cisco 
> library though.

I don't know why you'd want to. Native platform support is probably 
hardware accelerated.

> The future is uncertain. I have no idea if new platforms will popup 
> without H.264 support.

I didn't ask you to predict whether one would. What I asked for was 
much, much easier. What I asked for was a non-laughable story around how 
such a platform might arise in a way that precludes using the Cisco library.