IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 03 October 2018 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B831312C3 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.157
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.157 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KcxKC4r-RRut for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236111312E8 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w93FgWeJ017045; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:45:12 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=lGyErCmZPdOSyd9aF0zAlh9vsROGNsAqIHwBytW+A1o=; b=LK8dXazZW/s4qvYHCKTToP5JvYKL395NX6XAE81iitKdJ5xQkrYvPm1HVxDPWblmozbO tSBs7MCyX8w04gDpJRE8JIehPkA0WtMANg5D0HbKEynaq3L+44BHxLPjXf5iTfQe5w3s nCX2ymPIK0pWAVWzq3C2BwR0jCGEtALJI564EvgtyeQKsOsV611SeZNgyX1okyKJnL7X zeHjNzBqWFJDsLVPtITtW9XnzUWXb3Ox8/ndMlaaY9LR8gRGI1aJE4qWjshezMNCiu3n K2QH5FhvaEM3Tc9C11HA3MRLq6x6SZ0GStoD0lgjvT/zBOSqELM01TLYU2vJ4X6hMg9/ /A==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2mvguf2xap-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 Oct 2018 16:45:12 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w93FZCx2003296; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 11:45:12 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.57]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2mt4raua99-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 Oct 2018 11:45:12 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 11:45:10 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 11:45:10 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Security Area Advisory Group <saag@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
Thread-Index: AQHUWo2VH6xkljVOnEapGM4dLA+20qUMvd8AgAAHa4CAACJ0AIAARegAgACa9wD//+JogA==
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 15:45:09 +0000
Message-ID: <56BAE3F9-C5EC-47C7-9478-87445D973F62@akamai.com>
References: <7CB10AE4-09C1-4AC5-B255-6489EF1FAE78@akamai.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1810021734350.12702@bofh.nohats.ca> <BEC2489D-FE1E-4E55-A88C-05E0143F8415@gmail.com> <02a901d45aac$e83d4030$b8b7c090$@augustcellars.com> <C2A1A8A5-FE35-47D9-8B06-E4E572380FEB@gmail.com> <14967.1538573464@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <14967.1538573464@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.11.0.180909
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.34.126]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <4CAA8AF0851BFC45B904D73E4B15ED7D@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-10-03_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=787 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1810030150
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-10-03_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=779 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1810030151
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/AoyA7rLQKTDVmwSatVIkArlWqnY>
Subject: Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 15:45:16 -0000

>    If the community wanted Specification Required, wouldn't we have said that,
    rather than Expert Review?
  
Because it is the view of the current set of experts, at least, that a specification needs to be available.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email