IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Thu, 04 October 2018 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F85D12958B for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WGrQxSPZy3_E for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C65A1124BE5 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id a85-v6so5920423qkg.3 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8yy1u6rfAuUQycG63oETyGcewmrii3Bp1lzm7juhMi4=; b=IWMIOelr7wUup0Oo8JtcIE4CJew54WRclTyj5JTN93oDYvcZ9mxs7Jk8vUBSV+rXZA tL9irQkJvSZj/XZ5R06SIwVcWmHiED/oSboMZi0dJqwC1t4jVtOCBebYeY/3JL8f4U87 jr0LpXSTrTHfEqFH724VbNrYBS7fk/WKYsQH4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8yy1u6rfAuUQycG63oETyGcewmrii3Bp1lzm7juhMi4=; b=hTFZn9X8DHvNTKYl7WPHBjEmh/rwROExHGnpa3cI9S/dNw6IR7ZQazfoTYB5bd9iH3 /f9rX6ooWj7H82pB9T/1G5jSMlTw4xsWEYij9g/bZnr5/f1Zl6J2nY7BCP3X1TWxrAdX ad6QnKxUAejKhMQVzxcYMRM6xVXFBINVoLnQSHefEJOa6jYE+LKYEX9vh5hdRs59G8KA hzb1Bz03B3YkLFqSXglvVJmzhrb+4WuZvhRB1WMCAJ/iMoCx41cl5K86DPm0rpEfKRLH HUjac0aqwtcLIcqgD7ofag25zB4NUrEtwSffE5ff3sojMurbjkcd7dVputhm5HaXAOZn +kKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohsGn3o+M9LdI1ncj84VFjPsrnuMGacqMfwJCA72MwCJce1WrEb RBwkhEV+XAnCln3kWFQsX8/cDg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61m7gEwc7oLhF05I2UUYHWDLU+lUmdZmrepNCC//X2ZRD0dqiu9ToysXYQ+M3Zlfh8H2LmZnQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:dc43:: with SMTP id q64-v6mr5523694qkf.62.1538664802984; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.18] ([96.231.224.191]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s90-v6sm2771525qks.80.2018.10.04.07.53.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Oct 2018 07:53:21 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DCAFB4A-9CDB-4692-9382-FBD04DC8FA16@akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 10:53:20 -0400
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DBAF8917-3E3B-41DA-851B-5A925423ED7C@sn3rd.com>
References: <7CB10AE4-09C1-4AC5-B255-6489EF1FAE78@akamai.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1810021734350.12702@bofh.nohats.ca> <BEC2489D-FE1E-4E55-A88C-05E0143F8415@gmail.com> <20181002220720.GD56675@kduck.kaduk.org> <CABcZeBPJjfjdxbHCWFQFLJcnMKZSCpVb0oEZPhpymVgu-=bspQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DCAFB4A-9CDB-4692-9382-FBD04DC8FA16@akamai.com>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/Ei05chrRA-D7gt1sNjDAnfoCsbk>
Subject: Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 14:53:26 -0000


> On Oct 4, 2018, at 10:49, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> 	• The reasoning here was that having code points marked Not Recommended was better than having people squatting.
>  
> They’re actually “no comment” as opposed to Not Recommended.  The only way something gets to be recommended is if it’s a WG document.  This is, admittedly, a fine point and could well be lost on many, but it’s important.

Agreed that it will be lost on most, but I think it kind of makes sense.  The interesting flip side here is that there are going to be some perfectly good algorithms are not marked as Recommended.

spt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email