IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 04 October 2018 04:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708BB130DE0 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 21:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vosFu3FmVxyZ for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 21:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CF8D130DD5 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 21:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id q39-v6so5751817lfi.8 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 21:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DQmiQm9cYKzpSHijC0Cohmr1UuEER+iSWdzgT+JzmQw=; b=uTRh0Ucot+jN8hHY9wAB8wS6PO8cTOiqTwa1oqlON1+HPdTOhaCnIsW0QQabNnBFvq QwsUI6fZbBCqeJ3D3+06pqN0eDIniTVCmV9eztlX6QnWq9wR3uKPrPSrPqZ9o6+pxrmq tIwonHDo98NVr7m8KhSh2NwzumGtlXbBRRVY5K6f4IeFB7T+H7aZRwvETz3b9kwgkT5i ul7776f927EOTCngnylO5gyxoDpjry7gsw2LBT4/kjAYHdj0jQrKYd8TLbfrtA7Pwub7 dmc9TEU5fmmpkGdn0P+tJrU5YHFkUpWHa68cAUAGDBkQLzozXOD78xhKMfJQ2oITeA7h vsjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DQmiQm9cYKzpSHijC0Cohmr1UuEER+iSWdzgT+JzmQw=; b=HXg+gS1YfWflqDm3bUb7BNcbUA6NY3r3zrdyghWsjPoiXcEWbXqAus13zGdTRBKfCo yBB4g9H8ilGdLw/ftnBlSJMGrrA0vMdnK2+wl8ibGkQgiULbcdnzh79Tlb40C5tDZHq8 8Ph6RKKMFLEHy9oNezmw6/XLVZfnpursxCPDlddA3JB0/5tfv+bEjRl8XINmIWIFaq5U whaJqn5tL4kjpRpmB5Y0Jop5DvZeFXXPs8MsCIc5X7aSQVxioYhLYSF3RJZHK1ukiz5+ km44vKo37EeNoxEQwCYysDjuKXpHj8kAE8dJTdzYtiI2PhhbVpUj7KkxYP4zNWTUiNAQ p3wA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfog+iVd5YHyG8er7l4+jc0kBifcSF+tFcUaw1WN2mLnatCX+XH4m yHzwRpxch91wvFdAA2l405IrflYcr5sMGseGrr+97g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV635Z4vLILwB9deR4b5+jkyNN/4qLZJIFKQhMFUvWcoxKYGmf1LO85VqjUL+zR9uv2vYfJVm56HPSukgUtudXt8=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:7391:: with SMTP id h17-v6mr2776788lfk.140.1538628421311; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 21:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7CB10AE4-09C1-4AC5-B255-6489EF1FAE78@akamai.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1810021734350.12702@bofh.nohats.ca> <BEC2489D-FE1E-4E55-A88C-05E0143F8415@gmail.com> <02a901d45aac$e83d4030$b8b7c090$@augustcellars.com> <C2A1A8A5-FE35-47D9-8B06-E4E572380FEB@gmail.com> <14967.1538573464@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <14967.1538573464@localhost>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 21:46:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBO_RD+iHpytJ9T+e5AcU5E9LOT7V8np-WwfqLSrvhMqnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, saag@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007e6b3505775fd8b0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/euZZ0rsdqqlQIfXMPtaoRa7iT_s>
Subject: Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 04:47:06 -0000

At least part of the discussion around SR versus ER was about the validity
of I-Ds. Specifically, we wanted I-Ds to be a valid form of documentation
and there was some disagreement about whether they were for the purposes of
Specification Required. ER allowed us to specify that threshold clearly.

-Ekr


On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 6:31 AM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > They still need to ask IANA for an assignment, and IANA would refer
> it
>     > to the designated experts. Those designated experts (Rich, Nick, and
> I
>     > for TLS) can enforce that the document is available in English. In
>
> Why would you insist on this?
> If the community wanted Specification Required, wouldn't we have said that,
> rather than Expert Review?
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list
> saag@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email