Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 04 October 2018 20:44 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48815130E87 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7SUUfdwaVAgv for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu [18.7.68.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B945130DE3 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074424-511ff70000003854-be-5bb67b974d1e
Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 3B.E7.14420.79B76BB5; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:44:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id w94Ki5cr009730; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:44:06 -0400
Received: from kduck.kaduk.org (24-107-191-124.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com [24.107.191.124]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id w94Ki1aN013479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:44:03 -0400
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 15:44:01 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, saag@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20181004204400.GP56675@kduck.kaduk.org>
References: <7CB10AE4-09C1-4AC5-B255-6489EF1FAE78@akamai.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1810021734350.12702@bofh.nohats.ca> <BEC2489D-FE1E-4E55-A88C-05E0143F8415@gmail.com> <02a901d45aac$e83d4030$b8b7c090$@augustcellars.com> <C2A1A8A5-FE35-47D9-8B06-E4E572380FEB@gmail.com> <14967.1538573464@localhost> <CABcZeBO_RD+iHpytJ9T+e5AcU5E9LOT7V8np-WwfqLSrvhMqnA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBO_RD+iHpytJ9T+e5AcU5E9LOT7V8np-WwfqLSrvhMqnA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupgleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IR4hRV1p1RvS3aoGElm8WK1+fYLXoO9bNb vL91icliSn8nkwOLx5IlP5k8vs9j8pj8uI3Zo2XOHuYAligum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujKdzj7EU XOGpmHziAUsDYwtXFyMnh4SAiUTv5yaWLkYuDiGBxUwSGzovsIMkhAQ2MErs/6oKYV9hknh5 VBDEZhFQkWjbO5cNxGYDshu6LzOD2CICChK//pwAGsTBwSyQKnHztxdIWFggX+LJoalgI3mB dn3fcJ0RYtc3JomGBbfYIBKCEidnPmEBsZkFtCRu/HvJBDFHWmL5Pw6QMKdAoMSpaZuZQGxR AWWJvX2H2CcwCsxC0j0LSfcshO4FjMyrGGVTcqt0cxMzc4pTk3WLkxPz8lKLdM31cjNL9FJT SjcxggKZ3UVlB2N3j/chRgEORiUe3hfK26KFWBPLiitzDzFKcjApifI+erM1WogvKT+lMiOx OCO+qDQntfgQowQHs5IIb3gJUDlvSmJlVWpRPkxKmoNFSZx3YsviaCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpis DAeHkgSvYRVQo2BRanpqRVpmTglCmomDE2Q4D9Dw/5Ugw4sLEnOLM9Mh8qcYdTnanl6fwSzE kpeflyolzpsGMkgApCijNA9uDigBSWTvr3nFKA70ljDvZJAqHmDygpv0CmgJE9AS+ZwtIEtK EhFSUg2Mi/U2KWvc8c01PmjYvWHpByX+jLpmgSMTmyYnRcWxveE2ezrBy1OVKy6SKaQz96u/ afdPXrMFym/40jmmneaKn6y6emeEupH72o+frj24z31L+tKnuu/d5kuqPrWtvZZt/WTmE8lj gTp5+3smeglMeMyV1y/+01v6bqlVlo7Mo+nBf4z4UhOUWIozEg21mIuKEwEZQCyBGwMAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/wY5ILbU3STUJp_UaYJKU3lFT-GE>
Subject: Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 20:44:12 -0000
I think I may have lost track of the threading, but I'll note that for the TLS registries, we do use Specification Required, with a note about what constitutes a valid specification that explicitly allows I-Ds that are not progressed any further. -Ben On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:46:24PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote: > At least part of the discussion around SR versus ER was about the validity > of I-Ds. Specifically, we wanted I-Ds to be a valid form of documentation > and there was some disagreement about whether they were for the purposes of > Specification Required. ER allowed us to specify that threshold clearly. > > -Ekr > > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 6:31 AM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> > wrote: > > > > > Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > > They still need to ask IANA for an assignment, and IANA would refer > > it > > > to the designated experts. Those designated experts (Rich, Nick, and > > I > > > for TLS) can enforce that the document is available in English. In > > > > Why would you insist on this? > > If the community wanted Specification Required, wouldn't we have said that, > > rather than Expert Review? > > > > -- > > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works > > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > saag mailing list > > saag@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag > > > _______________________________________________ > saag mailing list > saag@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
- [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state cryp… Paul Wouters
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Nalini J Elkins
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Paul Wouters
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Dmitry Belyavsky
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Salz, Rich
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Carl Wallace
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Nico Williams
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Paul Wouters
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Paul Wouters
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Yoav Nir
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Yoav Nir
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Michael Richardson
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Jim Schaad
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Yoav Nir
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Jim Schaad
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Michael Richardson
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Salz, Rich
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Paul Wouters
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Yoav Nir
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Michael Richardson
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Salz, Rich
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Sean Turner
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Eric Rescorla
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Salz, Rich
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Nico Williams
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Sean Turner
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Sean Turner
- Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state … Benjamin Kaduk