IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Thu, 04 October 2018 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817C8130E7F for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pfVcn9peTnRj for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06E37130E63 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 09:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id q5-v6so6077974qki.6 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 09:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=dmEQ6XZeIhLYVg6gs7x0pvjCYLhEVGeQLMq0GuVzWcE=; b=GAanvkYxXVVQ+CugLqJPLjQFmYrCzOHL3bucl211V936aCsFI6ekDeXezrR3xF32fF 4GgAK0zgnQHEbYBLTBR3bZcQyMaT7PCklYqo1wJ8fjKoIJHymZy7v4XdbAiFyK4VoVAZ PbgKRvigXG5Or0gFccywwGlJmHmSsrnzmcDMo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=dmEQ6XZeIhLYVg6gs7x0pvjCYLhEVGeQLMq0GuVzWcE=; b=Z1F2UZS9R2otElvQ/1kdt7qS/Se9OmXH9sQfCmrDpcN3f4PiVa+1qiqRlyaQA0ejx4 2UxCit7I4cE75ypDpKbt4Q0CWlvr/3BZ+rrZFyl6AwzA07uBO0l5fIVc+EcaPVwRvMlr MKf0CXExwThKwkPqjnklOS7PCZZLJznOVN1o27XhxjTNruShmf+tObUf6PZn1cBotVzO MQRfMntyXRFCSilw79xmAbH717ORqVz/I52Ubxyqra52OfOuX3TJDdWpevBjWGk0xyuq 8BJ2pwSoreNVRBw7m55HpLLyTQUgX5cOzxKmNwQ0uRXbhQero1slUARhvnvSPbzQUnT6 +Lew==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogXkRqMVkBAGioG09OxcTarMtu8KMMNQdiCVsHnoeZSwcoDr4cS 9hGg1VollEZlOLI99uCCCbRawxgTn9k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60DrvjDRn4B0DEzX/Qfrmmw0tVUwFA+yK6hd++Fj5ngdKXvmfHc6f3dmRUHJRVXesqr/Y30qw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:1fd3:: with SMTP id n80-v6mr5815829qkh.56.1538669064081; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 09:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.18] ([96.231.224.191]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k185-v6sm2362999qkd.27.2018.10.04.09.04.22 for <saag@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Oct 2018 09:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 12:04:22 -0400
References: <7CB10AE4-09C1-4AC5-B255-6489EF1FAE78@akamai.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1810021734350.12702@bofh.nohats.ca> <BEC2489D-FE1E-4E55-A88C-05E0143F8415@gmail.com> <20181002220720.GD56675@kduck.kaduk.org> <CABcZeBPJjfjdxbHCWFQFLJcnMKZSCpVb0oEZPhpymVgu-=bspQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DCAFB4A-9CDB-4692-9382-FBD04DC8FA16@akamai.com> <CABcZeBMuRG6yrwkVwLpFu2ta6s=+7Q9oydT20AigZk2tP-vacQ@mail.gmail.com> <55940029-09B6-4352-A5F0-AAED811EAB44@akamai.com>
To: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <55940029-09B6-4352-A5F0-AAED811EAB44@akamai.com>
Message-Id: <6E9F236F-DD6F-4EB6-9893-0B7DAB7041BF@sn3rd.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/yYFmua7RnEJroJW6X0QieWa76-A>
Subject: Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 16:04:27 -0000

> On Oct 4, 2018, at 11:07, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> Ø  Perhaps the most appropriate thing would be to characterize the "N" marking as "it is not a 'Recommended code point'".
>  
> Yes.  I’d prefer “-“ instead of “N” but NBD.

In hindsight, “-“ would have been a little less in your face.  But, one of the things we also wanted to deal with were complaints by implementors that some customers were combing through the IANA registries and requesting that everything be implemented.  IMHO an “N” works better there.

spt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email