IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 04 October 2018 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED5B130E55 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.156
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.156 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14kUDs5umyp5 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EADCD130DF2 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 07:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w94Eab9w005457; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:49:05 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=pxLPY8zZinB4+Gl6YBjISuS3+TeGQEhAu4o637B0pq8=; b=nwriDgMt9VtuT7zXOejZYA11ibHx9rqQpW0X3I0d1BniVUIwVIrBMcKrYJ+SYwoTetPW vg/pQaSZcfRQ79pTXLW6YKhagS99IGPELcaaM6V3UrywmyD8WZcg5sGkvdaFcHQBE9uj oSSDX3LrhaKZOhN//NOLBSGF+XFUfoa+jym9nqK3ik9SfGrvr5sFKX+CELaStHBM3kAC L61uRhU2pMv+jicBaF21n8J8QPpj9/JjWM6zG1VS40dIKes5kU6DV4oRA7DoeSxOWvp0 c3NpM7BPT9Q4gdHTtxi2vzlV2ijr2iHTDNUuEORjcJyRZN/U0ywHyRjhkwDlPjR+Mv50 PQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2mw977sw53-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 Oct 2018 15:49:04 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w94EZ77M023437; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:49:04 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2mt4qvfdcx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 Oct 2018 10:49:03 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:49:03 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:49:03 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
CC: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
Thread-Index: AQHUWo2VH6xkljVOnEapGM4dLA+20qUMvd8AgAAHa4CAAAE8AIACAUuAgABl2wA=
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 14:49:02 +0000
Message-ID: <4DCAFB4A-9CDB-4692-9382-FBD04DC8FA16@akamai.com>
References: <7CB10AE4-09C1-4AC5-B255-6489EF1FAE78@akamai.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1810021734350.12702@bofh.nohats.ca> <BEC2489D-FE1E-4E55-A88C-05E0143F8415@gmail.com> <20181002220720.GD56675@kduck.kaduk.org> <CABcZeBPJjfjdxbHCWFQFLJcnMKZSCpVb0oEZPhpymVgu-=bspQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPJjfjdxbHCWFQFLJcnMKZSCpVb0oEZPhpymVgu-=bspQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.11.0.180909
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.34.234]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4DCAFB4A9CDB46929382FBD04DC8FA16akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-10-04_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=956 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1810040137
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-10-04_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=957 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1810040137
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/P53bxUEpOTlx5MSNONtUodZjF48>
Subject: Re: [saag] Discuss at SAAG? was Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 14:49:09 -0000

  *   The reasoning here was that having code points marked Not Recommended was better than having people squatting.

They’re actually “no comment” as opposed to Not Recommended.  The only way something gets to be recommended is if it’s a WG document.  This is, admittedly, a fine point and could well be lost on many, but it’s important.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email