Re: [tcpm] WGLC: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-02.txt

[John Heffner <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:03 PM, David Borman <[e-mail]> wrote:
> WG chair hat on:
> ----------------
> We are well past the end of the WGLC for this document.  On February 19, a new draft:
>        draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-03.txt
> was posted.  I have reviewed the differences between the -02 and -03 versions, and it appears to me that all of the issues that were raised against the -02 version have been addressed in the -03 version.  There have been no additional comments on the mailing list since the -03 version was made available.
>
> Therefore, we will be sending this document to the IESG in the next day or two, so if you have any additional issues with the -03 draft, you should speak up immediately.
>
>                        -David Borman, TCPM co-chair
>
> WG chair hat off:
> -----------------
> I just realized that:
> 1) The document should have at the top:
>        Updates: RFCs 793, 1011, 1122
> 2) The "1. Introduction" section should say that it updates all 3 RFCs, not just RFC 1122.
> 3) The Normative References should include RFC 1011.
> 4) The "4. Updating RFC 1122" section should also mention all 3 RFCs, not just RFC 1122
>
> The other RFCs that talk about the urgent pointer, 924, 944, 961 and 991, are all obsoleted by RFC 1011, hence only RFC 1011 needs to be mentioned.

Nit: in the title of Section 2.1: s/inications/indications/

  -John