IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] WGLC: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-02.txt

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Tue, 02 March 2010 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAFA28C28A for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:14:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8fJeJGTiHNRx for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:14:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.xmundo.net (smtp1.xmundo.net [201.216.232.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C48628C29E for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:13:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from venus.xmundo.net (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]) by smtp1.xmundo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D746B66E3; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:13:46 -0300 (ART)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (129-130-17-190.fibertel.com.ar [190.17.130.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by venus.xmundo.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o22MDd0v022052; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:13:40 -0300
Message-ID: <4B8D8D85.6090708@gont.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:13:25 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Heffner <johnwheffner@gmail.com>
References: <5981EBEA-5F7B-422A-A094-5D2548F705EB@windriver.com> <C88F591E-99C2-4131-843F-68DE4E8CE865@weston.borman.com> <1e41a3231003021336v549699e1yfb4c329d82fd38c8@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1e41a3231003021336v549699e1yfb4c329d82fd38c8@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]); Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:13:46 -0300 (ART)
Cc: David Borman <dab@weston.borman.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org WG" <tcpm@ietf.org>, ayourtch@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WGLC: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-02.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:14:09 -0000

John,

John Heffner wrote:
>> The other RFCs that talk about the urgent pointer, 924, 944, 961
>> and 991, are all obsoleted by RFC 1011, hence only RFC 1011 needs
>> to be mentioned.
> 
> Nit: in the title of Section 2.1: s/inications/indications/

Thanks! Will fix this in the next rev.

Kind regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email