Re: [tcpm] WGLC: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-02.txt

Ok, I did one more close reading of the spec, and I found a few more nits:

2.1: ...that data that were received as "normal data"
	s/were/was/

3.2: this clarification never was reflected into actual implementations
	s/never was/was never/

4.: hereby we update RFC 793
	s/hereby we/we hereby/

6: such that "urgent data" are delivered inline
	s/are/is/

7: e.g., depnding on the value
	s/depnding/depending/

A.4: That is, they will be accessible
	s/they/it/

A.6: cygwin environment, has shown that
	s/,//

			-David Borman

On Mar 2, 2010, at 10:29 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:

> David Borman wrote:
> 
>>> If you agree, I can post a rev in the next few days, so that we ship the
>>> I-D with all these tihngs fixes (plus the nit John Heffner has just
>>> pointed out).
>> 
>> That'd be great.  So if anyone else has any final comments, get them in now!
> 
> Heads-up: I've posted my working copy of the I-D (the upcomming -04
> version) at
> http://www.gont.com.ar/drafts/urgent-data/draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-04.txt
> 
> Please let me know if this one addresses all your comments (I think/hope
> it does!).
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm