IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] [Gendispatch] WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 30 April 2021 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685043A0FF4 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cyby69luGZwY for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10B203A0FF0 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A3DD45 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 06:51:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 06:51:11 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=2aKw1fz191H6ikynqw7UJV4cKBrdKz5ohouzRtTFx +c=; b=l4kRHQ3DLqj6E/TsXLUqp22AyPYMTgjeyktfkzwf0chevTIWqesh0s0cQ jC+CA74Zs/iKyJraFw566HiPEsiXDPR7HJUsfsp/ekTrIxpgVNy2b4Ecd2O3q9JW +twdfU8vuB8SWCzxcXym4bnGUifWHbUwABaxQnkcBl2a+hz0LlD9CJzHVNZ32LC7 bo5w8O0Cb+MFRcV9AW2ugVUxp8qQ5W5HddeOxkeGDdtJlBfRu3Hz4ln6gJXFjaRs udZKE8xUv7GpXqLIjOoUPcZE7fn+kfHCXR2TxV8vpmkAHS8oZe0PyccR07IWt26s VnHxjDnKHvuJNfx9LiVLcTFK1vhmA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:HOGLYNryAv-ublZdTvtbH1SsjgslTU0hZ86wL1g1tauNhHgjgikJ2w> <xme:HOGLYPpeX2_ej6YfjV0yL9vowYLKCErLoEIlUBQxpXkTzr5TyWpsFPSVSMQks57lZ js1ooYHF-pC4w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddviedgfeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtje ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekvdeggfelue elkeeuhfffheeghffhkeeuvdduudeihfehudefffdtgfdtkeffgfenucfkphepvdefrddu vdegrddutddrudejtdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:HOGLYKNkyGwOUFLgGA3VlzKBmSTMlaTOzZVSEJ9_uv9LywC3TavdTA> <xmx:HOGLYI635MA8K6oUYnOuHDEzVZszbQ7-IRs832IwakQ6Jy7vYmEcyw> <xmx:HOGLYM5_dzV5fKOewH6I_7OI8NMgmSE6UHQm2yFR8RYSkypfh8oWzg> <xmx:HuGLYDKN4kiJVwNFRbdolqjhDZVbMyHiKPzW4UFwsVuSsJY1z03XOw>
Received: from [192.168.1.121] (23-124-10-170.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [23.124.10.170]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <terminology@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 06:51:08 -0400 (EDT)
To: terminology@ietf.org
References: <161918836800.7390.6996403788262551415@ietfa.amsl.com> <2563B42A-20A4-4A9F-B9CA-518A72A0A095@eggert.org> <5ecee462-e42b-ef6f-3841-4a33facf0e29@digitaldissidents.org> <a7628390-7f29-1d05-8509-ae008458894a@network-heretics.com> <cae8b578-7627-1a40-ee82-59cf4fba9bd9@digitaldissidents.org>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <84b04331-0ced-a0d8-7ee6-5a57bbe664ae@network-heretics.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 06:51:07 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cae8b578-7627-1a40-ee82-59cf4fba9bd9@digitaldissidents.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/KpXaGRsLGJnXIFYT9xqRUbme85o>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] [Gendispatch] WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:51:16 -0000

On 4/30/21 5:41 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:

> The development of 3GPP and IEEE standards and procedures is generally slower than in the IETF. There is some quite good quantitative analysis on this.

I didn't say we were the slowest, just slower than we'd like.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email