IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] [Gendispatch] WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 29 April 2021 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E11E3A1611 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.618
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r1y_1Z3YesQC for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD7243A160E for <terminology@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631691262; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:39:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=EKj90PmhptM9AunBec11YH0gwHCDFv3YHGS2r9AD+ PY=; b=NuhH+xjbOsjgTzUPC2sz9J0srhrRfAFt/1aikXrn5KMYHesnG8jNmI7vk UxoG0pYdbR/AaseAI5p+1ganXrDCmYbT0Qh3iyiOnucQBdkaU4r7MeYrh5qTst0S 7xgzxJs/JWFsP/TXkM6/ubcsVPNveAyqvjXDki0JBk2tq6Rg1fptzmK39fGj5I8q 1F9PKicAJ8LYlFk+L8pt0k+bIKM3htUnI++aVEODDVnVCLEIsbWPSJ8Txr+nKrNo Bs2HrBf98FB+1WGdLO+BOfc22g5avEhfs2JYihALvrlng3pthFB8x4uBsXymJ398 wkUDv2uYRg+pAUdznqPhyNn/dSuLQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:mTWLYB475jysfzecfPlwc0wM1JUgOvvHdwOc-vx3e8arJ2v9qtma1A> <xme:mTWLYO47wpIw7D9m2IS_9SOpc9u-GDJsdffFRMiP7bJO4wqoO1YgqE2H5pMfbpWgf ghx1dMzkjq1oA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddvhedguddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptgfgggfuhfgjfffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihht hhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepiefgtdeihfegtdduieelheevhfeigfefleevteeltdev geeifeeghffgteetieeunecukfhppedujedvrdehkedrudegvddrudehjeenucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:mTWLYIewU5mWYLN4cBLIn26Y-rfQdkHy59TCs4iuAGXK4XnW8HJV0w> <xmx:mTWLYKLfkoz_Ehluzo5XSgIpBObSz_b318WwwfJpxfKivz3XRRmlNw> <xmx:mTWLYFKIELFxynzOqy5vy2nBF2u_AIT7fbawtIKwa7S6fgX-u7O1ng> <xmx:mzWLYIm-bHnca-Ux2H7MKMMKP55H__0cLAOZqC3CcC2BeouZeJZsCA>
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [172.58.142.157]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:39:21 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <6A5DA6CC-573E-4ABA-AAEB-EDEB28D2C9F1@akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:39:17 -0400
Cc: terminology@ietf.org
Message-Id: <6AFB15EC-A4AE-4CF9-9A29-797208A6EE63@network-heretics.com>
References: <6A5DA6CC-573E-4ABA-AAEB-EDEB28D2C9F1@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18E199)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/t1V4MJewp4fA_J9CXajRs7fauNY>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] [Gendispatch] WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 22:39:32 -0000


Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 29, 2021, at 3:55 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> The point of this WG is to do exactly what you would have struck from the charter.

Yet another reason why the group should not be chartered.

Either we find common cause or getting consensus is hopeless.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email