IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsv-art] [OPSEC] HbH flags [Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06]

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Thu, 06 December 2018 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A669B130E70; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 06:13:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sbv7zpVJAeu9; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 06:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6178127598; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 06:13:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Mucae9UXLTGbe+vcSNeAp/yVrfkgl8J57JFGHhgVK1A=; b=LoN6jV36Z9ELPhWlwh8+pU7tW s6H1ndjSnNnif8MCczxlMYw2rChCc2OSt366xQUJEKqmDBQTv4GMVCiAmSq06fWKpqYYXxbZJYT53 sZ1ZIF+OnijQEBmKkrku5elkpcF0Br9vwHnTwyorxrPfCnQ5Wi6wd+PP423yx9K8RJ7QTNBWFu3hx p1Zj08pYO0Ta0wLrocMGjI4Mh1E3mkDhXG0nnz0LbjtwDo3pBAof40OlzpIg1aU4NjZHaRWKH74QC yxFBrqr1wXx2egNtA78sulNPEDaH+TpaSEZYzOYwdT8xDozM8qTt7aqAA+UqcNDfNIPWYXn/7bZD0 R7BAdLbIg==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.240.132]:57454 helo=[192.168.1.16]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1gUuOy-000Cm4-Vc; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 09:13:18 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (16B92)
In-Reply-To: <20181206092221.GD1543@Space.Net>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 06:13:16 -0800
Cc: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>, tsv-art@ietf.org, opsec wg mailing list <opsec@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <103CB0D1-4CC3-4ABB-AF0A-4BB1A8131D51@strayalpha.com>
References: <2386B45D-8AEE-4C95-BB00-A5A2ABF63F8A@strayalpha.com> <e5198c02-ebc6-ee3e-96cb-fd2831164f41@gmail.com> <02AD0268-BFB8-4CA2-8985-08AFE6013ABB@strayalpha.com> <6c071ce7-609b-fcf2-8977-9159afece9ec@gmail.com> <E008EA4B-74D3-4251-BFB8-B88F544B2A99@strayalpha.com> <260f1445-0690-691b-5aea-83b7a43bfdcb@gmail.com> <39A24B3F-1332-4A9B-AAF3-0E9B896F7906@strayalpha.com> <CAL9jLaYPPiXECcLdCfe35tCwBaSvswObo7skO7pqN2t2TXskqw@mail.gmail.com> <52009CB5-FAA4-47D6-AC05-C16049758663@strayalpha.com> <811D965A-149E-4E33-A526-2CFCB7A1882B@strayalpha.com> <20181206092221.GD1543@Space.Net>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/PgNJXD7fIFUV7-wjzElIddno0cg>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] [OPSEC] HbH flags [Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06]
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 14:13:33 -0000


> On Dec 6, 2018, at 1:22 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:31:32PM -0800, Joe Touch wrote:
>> Again, if HBH headers are meaningless and not needed, then go through the proper process and remove them from IPv6. If not, stop trying to hobble this protocol to the point where we all realize why nobody wants to use it. 
> 
> I don't think "lack of extensibility" is the major showstopper in 
> IPv6 deployment.

Then remove EHs. IN STANDARDS.

> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

No, but I haven’d DISabled it either.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email