IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Txauth] Name criteria

Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de> Tue, 28 April 2020 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <fett@danielfett.de>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3473A129C for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=danielfett.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8hdxbT55dSR2 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d3f.me (redstone.d3f.me [5.9.29.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B06A3A128D for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from authenticated-user (PRIMARY_HOSTNAME [PUBLIC_IP]) by d3f.me (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B94767544; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:01:27 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielfett.de; s=dkim; t=1588096887; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zAvWO7nnih8asyzX6xTyFGST8/6k3bRrmVNcqSuhaVo=; b=ZFdf4MqGytRxkWI6ueZct8PGOoz9kkqdWsQlOfsfziiTjhMuQvPJ2D1leGhnRJHAlpYEly KkRN9hAOLBTlkx69wqVlK1bnb8KCEQB7wCj0dNP712kwJfLsL/Vn0N7dqldoj+uctgRguR S5DkwxQOq/R6vYtnPAhzritBjvYPsJg=
To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Cc: txauth@ietf.org
References: <CH2PR00MB06781CD67118A28C36F78B27F5AC0@CH2PR00MB0678.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-v1O1781w5=V-d9oBk4_RtbeVWy=VnrRbgvMN-Jbs5Fkw@mail.gmail.com> <CDB1365F-D192-4B49-B379-65ECF32F9AA9@gmail.com> <MN2PR00MB06883348AD3AC31B1A01EFD9F5AC0@MN2PR00MB0688.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-t+i=ur3Qju3GYReCLuCZeRNpObh-M8mik0ObdYha8THg@mail.gmail.com> <5f2a0446-9b87-3251-246f-5d7b84e9822a@danielfett.de> <CAD9ie-v5YTuUmkQXO0YvPePNb-eY2o6cb9WSZHibtgjZ4pPUcA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de>
Message-ID: <9938e1eb-c4d8-d842-d32f-3aac86f123eb@danielfett.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 20:01:26 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAD9ie-v5YTuUmkQXO0YvPePNb-eY2o6cb9WSZHibtgjZ4pPUcA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------CD8E1DEB4D05328C0CA49B10"
Content-Language: de-DE
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielfett.de; s=dkim; t=1588096887; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zAvWO7nnih8asyzX6xTyFGST8/6k3bRrmVNcqSuhaVo=; b=Mh9KZu8Lfje9Szvr0ii2jSoCtzFajw9BKHLBqSR2LbJ7NJzjQvK8xbJCYcnr21Rg9BIRCk Bb+LXmFfltTHekqb7PYADhxk4Bkz16iDUxZWKMJaf9FdHLUGoMZ9il9S+7WAbORt4e0R// tiotMOfiSiUy043pWFr6ToJneJw7DbU=
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=danielfett.de; t=1588096887; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CQZ2X7uG7yAN/HiiYIGOVP7hEr0ch7tnk/r9yzNstYQ7sBwptcydYnEyYSG+8chH7Ftk4z 82rE1tGDQ+Mc5ByWpwU//zX2NzgOYRL8Xjv53t5E/pmVxx4HBWao+GogdPu+mVqOkFTZpD 5HnxN7IcOfVcLKCVYpzXploDY1GMQRY=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; d3f.me; auth=pass smtp.auth=fett@danielfett.de smtp.mailfrom=fett@danielfett.de
Authentication-Results: d3f.me; auth=pass smtp.auth=fett@danielfett.de smtp.mailfrom=fett@danielfett.de
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/1AQFUkmxHHqqxk1qj1cZsKXeilY>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] Name criteria
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:01:36 -0000

Am 28.04.20 um 19:54 schrieb Dick Hardt:
> Daniel: I'm in favor of the intent of your suggestion -- but curious
> which languages we would test that in. Doing it for all languages is
> impractical. A negative connotation may also be a locale rather than
> language specific. For example, a fag in the UK (a cigarette) is very
> different than a fag in the US/Canada (offensive term for a homosexual
> man).

If it is in the Urban Dictionary, it is probably a bad choice ;-)

No, seriously, I guess we can just google for "<x> definition", "<x>
translation" and see what comes up.

-Daniel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email