Re: [Txauth] Name criteria

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Tue, 28 April 2020 03:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96803A03ED for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U6SY8XjFJCVB for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 817D33A02BE for <txauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id d25so759298lfi.11 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Y5TCsyJx11KoMsLwGUwm4a4p7q9/dRo5V2Jg5ObTxNA=; b=JPMtoVuQtQyis0N6M5I7I2XNrn8j/X2PZXozvI+HkvTerI35jowHej+5MZvdFzai1q BEuQOyLXpQ5cIELA1AHRdKTg3aKIV5TzTwXV9S+jRXm3+oomoOsQvUDy8PQSctIGYhKS +k4oni3s63whLxPeV5Oj7Q8zBFQ4G4wIYE5RJ8HKqyIXhVmEXOB9OOJoohv3rRQwwz8O g8A9cFoEeWX9KPe93wDtXYMXm8s4akAGWI3I91SZrAXizJ9KPkTrkJIUk/W248agWT12 1vsc7sRAJxG3utvcpQYUzM70KjaOfvTV41UXwYiM8951zca6Twm52wtHYEmTT9mAkT7y gDTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y5TCsyJx11KoMsLwGUwm4a4p7q9/dRo5V2Jg5ObTxNA=; b=sh9jHgvXzZMBO1aacW/CYINQP8heIm7tVBk30WM8uBLNULwhj2RV1479GSKAg4I2Qs 2BbsRuCqddv5i5nzvIx9tr1ZEgqAtie3suLCVFIcfz14nI78XOkeRui4WNOATUBXqgew BoGIt86+aUR/JJKCFiUhFach3GlklqzgDlt1eekT5gnYoFZWbYlEhMxSyLzO0kGwhqyg qu5e7WB1x6HO1gtWwZ41DjlahZEbbcE6EKKopSuzqcVFDL1zrpSUHLlx3VdPtXCNE9LJ QI1BjX8thbuJCOnxi4/Ze2ASpxhvPjGeznQbwUvvHkskdjzLNU7RjuMtT1oU9/VQo85U mvDw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYCp7pZ3em2ehqKEV+R830I7fG97QZ/fYukocjgjMo6FDQ3egr4 nHuJGIVKSJx45WG2qNvW3IOxDENq68HqUyvsNFk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ/cUNP1Kfvcl4zXggqRvB0JxFyg22QOZFXTeDdj7rXbWHFygVZeKil8lGxxE2CnaC1R4ARmgGlSF/A2rmeJro=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:10c5:: with SMTP id k5mr17834564lfg.0.1588046241485; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CH2PR00MB06781CD67118A28C36F78B27F5AC0@CH2PR00MB0678.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH2PR00MB06781CD67118A28C36F78B27F5AC0@CH2PR00MB0678.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:56:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD9ie-v1O1781w5=V-d9oBk4_RtbeVWy=VnrRbgvMN-Jbs5Fkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Cc: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>, "txauth@ietf.org" <txauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001c5b0005a451d40b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/Fkjz7f_FjkAxW1nPQClseNoboSY>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] Name criteria
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:57:26 -0000

I pick 6 chars since all the protocols I could think of were <= 6 chars in
their short form, but I'm fine just stack ranking them.

Would we agree that all other things being equal, shorter is better?

The related dimension would be number of syllables. A smaller number of
syllables makes it easier to say.

... and to argue with Mike ... because it is fun ... :)

The short form for OpenID Connect is OIDC ... and the previous version is
just OpenID ... and while rarely used, SCIM is System for Cross-domain
Identity Management (which as we all know was made up to match the acronym
which originally was Simple Cloud Identity Management)

TCP/IP is the common term used for the wire transport. (6 chars)





On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 6:57 PM Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> I agree with Justin that the “short” criteria is overly restrictive.
> Remember too, that many protocols have a short and a long name, but some
> don’t.  Some common ones with both long and short names are:
>
>               Internet Protocol (IP)
>
>               Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
>
> An example without a short name is:
>
>               OpenID Connect
>
> An example that effectively only has a short name is:
>
>               SCIM
>
>
>
> All of these kinds of reasonable names should be eligible for
> consideration, not all of which are short.
>
>
>
>                                                        -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Txauth <txauth-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Justin Richer
> *Sent:* Monday, April 27, 2020 6:37 PM
> *To:* Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* txauth@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Txauth] Name criteria
>
>
>
> I think the 6-character length requirement is more under “desirable” than
> “required”. Shorter names are often better, but that doesn’t make a longer
> name off limits for consideration.
>
>
>
>  — Justin
>
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2020, at 7:19 PM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Riffing on the work done to name Perl6, here are the name criteria I
> propose:
>
>
>
> Required:
>
>    1. No confusion with another protocol or major software project
>    2. no existing registered trademarks in related classes
>    3. Less than 1M results in Google
>    4. Short (<=6 chars)
>    5. Descriptive of protocol (this criteria is subjective)
>
> Desirable:
>
>    1. Straightforward to pronounce
>    2. Easy to spell
>    3. Easy to read
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Txauth mailing list
> Txauth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>
>
>