Re: [Txauth] Name criteria

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 28 April 2020 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3E13A1962 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.127
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.127 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MALFORMED_FREEMAIL=1.968, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wh3VrQif0s4E for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77743A195E for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id e26so3942086wmk.5 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=0AdMFaSZx8JEn88xPGoqBGMIpzIlTJEY498NY8c3Tz8=; b=dII2mo9DU0OZpJmLYX3oT1jyTeLC8ogESM33zyxrvCqYhdILe4AhBHXDoWJOF6YNP1 DRVSHg8jvQIYrqRaOlzWh06la6t2LNdlZ7aJAPkXwycN8aJQnvyy7djCWoAmFxUPmmsF 5efdzTP32r1FAN8Vjz1mq/l6VNYM6UjVHgwoeHtVRcO8lhzdj9iBG7eDEe7swc3nWPLE 3NsUGBOa8Qyj9jcnpUOoG541m1KE+HS5Ii3cgPFoi8Ha/6hYqW42R+Tmb17+oe/mt++Q 6I5dj2ikv1dBku6BmMpHiiWy31+QS9npIlqwdR9JFo64aveSF19WWhk0PbPe2SptSRXB X38g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=0AdMFaSZx8JEn88xPGoqBGMIpzIlTJEY498NY8c3Tz8=; b=eY4fkL6XV5ZODFlaeqrLkQNg8WxdJNRvX30SE0Jtr1wrVo5B+QtW3sGsE82WicNQeK 0L2H81RicRSgLSKWAemqJKMd0p2mKnB8mmdJlKn3/sZod5DdSX8vZZ0/jLxIfdTAmUhe ysZy6jiS7Uas0Azn4xscx5m5sdibzxuMM/1nFITv80P1w7zC46WuSnvpbt9zApsGpq9W NPg2W/LmaC8c+n2rLYJXK7zP8j0ozVHH/lvXqaZjkV7OL3MmQg2ZEdFt+ItmsHvFWfck Op4f5o05T4Ycn0AjVEyfK00gsSWKF6XWQvYNgf4jX65N6zGgddzoa/Ggj8gp6jhYBK2p fwXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubK9vPsYcA3oe2/g/9HmJG/aSK0KPFlJLawWKOsXf0TmOXvSIfW GL8F/0hXFBnOrHNnyyxTLB0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL3gsYHdkgZF/ERQ3T+etR0IyiSuyI6i8444w6Ebfcqd1yhhJxsWlP+ysASW0heATEgqp0DIw==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f416:: with SMTP id z22mr5996095wma.32.1588098664258; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.139] (bzq-79-179-96-118.red.bezeqint.net. [79.179.96.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a67sm4514465wmc.30.2020.04.28.11.31.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.36.20041300
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:31:02 +0300
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>, Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de>
CC: txauth@ietf.org
Message-ID: <0064DFB4-0521-4621-B3F4-780FDC4B1CDE@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Txauth] Name criteria
References: <CH2PR00MB06781CD67118A28C36F78B27F5AC0@CH2PR00MB0678.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-v1O1781w5=V-d9oBk4_RtbeVWy=VnrRbgvMN-Jbs5Fkw@mail.gmail.com> <CDB1365F-D192-4B49-B379-65ECF32F9AA9@gmail.com> <MN2PR00MB06883348AD3AC31B1A01EFD9F5AC0@MN2PR00MB0688.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-t+i=ur3Qju3GYReCLuCZeRNpObh-M8mik0ObdYha8THg@mail.gmail.com> <5f2a0446-9b87-3251-246f-5d7b84e9822a@danielfett.de> <CAD9ie-v5YTuUmkQXO0YvPePNb-eY2o6cb9WSZHibtgjZ4pPUcA@mail.gmail.com> <9938e1eb-c4d8-d842-d32f-3aac86f123eb@danielfett.de> <CAD9ie-v3sFuVbYJphPQAAeJQJZmOJGLfu-18sUywzN=n_Z70-g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD9ie-v3sFuVbYJphPQAAeJQJZmOJGLfu-18sUywzN=n_Z70-g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3670954263_1996631605"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/wzVLt966g2J9l3K0RjGSPKDycNs>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] Name criteria
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:31:08 -0000

If someone in the working group finds it offensive, it is. Not very scientific but IMO good enough.

 

From: Txauth <txauth-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 at 21:12
To: Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de>
Cc: <txauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] Name criteria

 

But which languages are we checking? There are alot in the world. The phonetics of the name could be offensive -- ie it could be an offensive word when said in China or Japan. I don't know how to use google to search phonetics. 

ᐧ

 

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:01 AM Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de> wrote:

Am 28.04.20 um 19:54 schrieb Dick Hardt:

Daniel: I'm in favor of the intent of your suggestion -- but curious which languages we would test that in. Doing it for all languages is impractical. A negative connotation may also be a locale rather than language specific.. For example, a fag in the UK (a cigarette) is very different than a fag in the US/Canada (offensive term for a homosexual man).

If it is in the Urban Dictionary, it is probably a bad choice ;-)

No, seriously, I guess we can just google for "<x> definition", "<x> translation" and see what comes up. 

-Daniel

 

-- Txauth mailing list Txauth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth