IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Txauth] Name criteria

Amanjeev Sethi <aj@amanjeev.com> Tue, 28 April 2020 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <aj@amanjeev.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09143A116B for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=amanjeev.com header.b=ERMabUkb; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=o9Y+hN2f
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WLiYd4WQsihD for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51BF3A1166 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBF0786; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:58:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap8 ([10.202.2.58]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:58:22 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amanjeev.com; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=pLPJcJ91xrHucxqECVONSBZPi3tm4C3 TY1I7DhjM+Z8=; b=ERMabUkbfVQgbIvBKi6jjvirjm9n7XnbEctfpSYL+RpdVPn VTsqX/7Z7lHwq701dnD7Pay4z69YILowRWELF9KidNxlmLFsP6GhTJ0OdqBoKmH8 Fm6jxnq69OlU/ryCINiE0Sb7P5/pdnt8ZnlGK6lp7C1i2de2RP+cBODBzXc/RDts MiPPbxwisOaAYUGQWZTJjV8u+HNnc6M5adQCMnOwmS+htO02qRWhTJ0uqt28kbg5 YJZp8CT/KVEhTbJYslwP3TSeZWGnSDJFU7+M50NRK3lhGO63cCh/NCyNAcyV8hJc wT2wgvmIEgFCuWqmkCWjffwXYLCWvgrrNjwVmEw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=pLPJcJ 91xrHucxqECVONSBZPi3tm4C3TY1I7DhjM+Z8=; b=o9Y+hN2f+JteAtYmvobqZD TiDIPI7oN7nkMvsN7S9/iQsTGGCqhL12C57LNRzHETAWObLXM6Bfa6hnRAEEtg/O 6E1iSg+6ckTeNXMVphEp5DmO03GXFAjbYIfTOmeGPU/Q2JC3Kl3R5nnsXYLrCVel VxUa5805zGjerxTpaIa+oogQSrFYHCxw7LicVz/Ozdy4FC5osCT2LSv3Ae7uzV2R pGcUBvXhdv2zotrwr3ozqmMxmBNq9SYNmBCerAKSWlzlnYyy9wS03t9bNfQ6GxfJ 5GG+BZt0zM5F6k58f06wVEWjw5YqfBkU9TNGRQEjYLcqRtDsukQY7N6gTd48ch9A ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:vW6oXuGToeubVpwZXe_nceSdusfj8qKaAZVNzYOosAHPTlYOTcdDow>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedriedugdduudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtreerreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdetmhgr nhhjvggvvhcuufgvthhhihdfuceorghjsegrmhgrnhhjvggvvhdrtghomheqnecuffhomh grihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrjhesrghmrghnjhgvvghvrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:vW6oXicfOMO-NaPkKU9BETEw8qcM80tmTDAozcnaoONFiL5ArUy4rQ> <xmx:vW6oXlnfFjn-P0W-iOgzg2Dii5pnHbNlty-SIros8Rm6gz5kwTpM7g> <xmx:vW6oXsqNlf6IJDwhJ4F1yr0AODlc8DWIBJp2KV8scmPJFCeQ3HIXSg> <xmx:vm6oXoPA85lrW7ZUiMMPG_1hfeTD9tac-U_KsneTnJKv-shyG1HC0A>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id BFEEE520093; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:58:21 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-351-g9981f4f-fmstable-20200421v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <fed892f4-3502-4823-bf67-37872ada4121@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD9ie-v5YTuUmkQXO0YvPePNb-eY2o6cb9WSZHibtgjZ4pPUcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CH2PR00MB06781CD67118A28C36F78B27F5AC0@CH2PR00MB0678.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-v1O1781w5=V-d9oBk4_RtbeVWy=VnrRbgvMN-Jbs5Fkw@mail.gmail.com> <CDB1365F-D192-4B49-B379-65ECF32F9AA9@gmail.com> <MN2PR00MB06883348AD3AC31B1A01EFD9F5AC0@MN2PR00MB0688.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-t+i=ur3Qju3GYReCLuCZeRNpObh-M8mik0ObdYha8THg@mail.gmail.com> <5f2a0446-9b87-3251-246f-5d7b84e9822a@danielfett.de> <CAD9ie-v5YTuUmkQXO0YvPePNb-eY2o6cb9WSZHibtgjZ4pPUcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:58:00 -0400
From: Amanjeev Sethi <aj@amanjeev.com>
To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>, Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de>
Cc: txauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="40241a4a4ebf4863a3bf90f610b1608a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/FqsSKpnSV0stkuRATCJYlthRK9k>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] Name criteria
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:58:26 -0000

Does no one think that "intent driven" can be used for creating a name?

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020, at 1:54 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
> Daniel: I'm in favor of the intent of your suggestion -- but curious which languages we would test that in. Doing it for all languages is impractical. A negative connotation may also be a locale rather than language specific. For example, a fag in the UK (a cigarette) is very different than a fag in the US/Canada (offensive term for a homosexual man).
> ᐧ
> 
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:09 AM Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de> wrote:
>> Am 28.04.20 um 19:04 schrieb Dick Hardt:
>>> Revised criteria:
>>> 
>>> Required:
>>>  1. No confusion with another protocol, major software project, or IETF/IRTF WG name
>>>  2. no existing registered trademarks in related classes
>>>  3. Less than 1M results in Google
>>>  4. Descriptive of protocol (this criteria is subjective)
>>> Desirable:
>>>  1. Straightforward to pronounce
>>>  2. Easy to spell 
>>>  3. Easy to read
>>>  4. Shortish
>> 5. Not a negatively connotated word in another language

>> -Daniel

>> --
>>  Txauth mailing list
>> Txauth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
> -- 
> Txauth mailing list
> Txauth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email