Re: [Txauth] Name criteria

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Tue, 28 April 2020 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F130F3A0ECE for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.692
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.692 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xZ0KgRWBUGrU for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1631B3A0EE5 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id j14so17655156lfg.9 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lvpmLma6Sh3K8hJBkVNcDnWkJoCPn9RTozFvjlQRuRM=; b=tk2fw0BGxTr7I89uQBF0m5C9TXwdCO5c3iCHoK0JoJrAdLfdfsho9Zb2IKMu9JCF/o 6Jc+YhfS3oBFIM/C/3G6q6Mf462JBBzmDqZo3zskzqHDNaT3HRuH9muYmzhsc8JMBpuD AqF05242NeaZuhsokOWK0ljulf0rCx0lgt66wA404H6XvrIwFw0sO6tw8YwVUElEKZt9 3DniK9W2lzQcH3xZVFcXyx27CF4ON3F8Sg2fifiZsLrsWB2OAdVLipiPEwZbh6Ma34Na m2UhJQDizH/RPjDE+Ds5rjJSY0LSkSQ/sk8qdnTykgCuowyuxBxRekUDxEKPEyJ7xbAU 0zmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lvpmLma6Sh3K8hJBkVNcDnWkJoCPn9RTozFvjlQRuRM=; b=j624sSPHCf6wY/StyR6AIsaG6GZ6HBxigU6xn4F6wIhTBIYCVx/s7VAz7cUrLVKd3h r2GA9+RBsLC9zd1a6zxvn/6332GgpfQbg4XNq2Aw88K4Jiglu0kF8RN8PfwmgpxodrAy FGYuAAOGUwqjuT6jNP63x3MCo3LnPP6Bb9V5rWdy4BJ749gBACSmh69seAN4FXqYzJfe GVTKRAbT/4DpXQrYhQDdK+kR4m7iOS82UEaBev/4sDzQuQIOisSC5D8yd3COrzFxubYX sFg1ZqN9IwErhu87rM6M8DrjivNP8zz18wk/v1frJmvIZRLQ0j1iE4G0BhIk6qkfgkBF 2MVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZEv05nAKCs0ddGMHeza/B17D/SYkAIm4KpRIifEBhkZfECohr5 N/IaLauTTK0oukqBgJUPMugpUp3hdGOvYwUPiqU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIchiDst1LbVJV1TL7k7IHSTUj6bEpjS+AI2inhJjSsQZtt20TETq/7Mf/kYf0IG0lLD3p+m9dbe2sXQ43aHxs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:40f:: with SMTP id u15mr20220974lfk.207.1588096475008; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CH2PR00MB06781CD67118A28C36F78B27F5AC0@CH2PR00MB0678.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-v1O1781w5=V-d9oBk4_RtbeVWy=VnrRbgvMN-Jbs5Fkw@mail.gmail.com> <CDB1365F-D192-4B49-B379-65ECF32F9AA9@gmail.com> <MN2PR00MB06883348AD3AC31B1A01EFD9F5AC0@MN2PR00MB0688.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-t+i=ur3Qju3GYReCLuCZeRNpObh-M8mik0ObdYha8THg@mail.gmail.com> <5f2a0446-9b87-3251-246f-5d7b84e9822a@danielfett.de>
In-Reply-To: <5f2a0446-9b87-3251-246f-5d7b84e9822a@danielfett.de>
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:54:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD9ie-v5YTuUmkQXO0YvPePNb-eY2o6cb9WSZHibtgjZ4pPUcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de>
Cc: txauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004316bb05a45d86c1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/pmAOTJNPWDRl8bvYyS9VCZ-EZIM>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] Name criteria
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:54:42 -0000

Daniel: I'm in favor of the intent of your suggestion -- but curious which
languages we would test that in. Doing it for all languages is impractical.
A negative connotation may also be a locale rather than language specific.
For example, a fag in the UK (a cigarette) is very different than a fag in
the US/Canada (offensive term for a homosexual man).
ᐧ

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:09 AM Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de> wrote:

> Am 28.04.20 um 19:04 schrieb Dick Hardt:
>
> Revised criteria:
>
> Required:
>
>    1. No confusion with another protocol, major software project, or
>    IETF/IRTF WG name
>    2. no existing registered trademarks in related classes
>    3. Less than 1M results in Google
>    4. Descriptive of protocol (this criteria is subjective)
>
> Desirable:
>
>    1. Straightforward to pronounce
>    2. Easy to spell
>    3. Easy to read
>    4. Shortish
>
> 5. Not a negatively connotated word in another language
>
> -Daniel
> --
> Txauth mailing list
> Txauth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>