IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Txauth] Name criteria

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Tue, 28 April 2020 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64713A14BB for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id deOxsJAq37KO for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D51C3A14B6 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id f8so17721209lfe.12 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HHH6Kqzbwn+qbkVGrFSaS91Azb8LE0gMSYOCXlC5j0g=; b=lptR2vzvCZnPL9TG0dQoOtIJHIh0FYC1PHEGsa5hakH2pcXkDurbU2aQE9NPYHqSxa W7BKBbZveeS8yDkw6fNHDVIQt2YNbh1ePhzvxRMXWXg0V5FYiJkqBK0/C/8g+f1z82hV /XueN8OIJJSlgxtneZWjKzwhC7b5tSlYIiNJgwXEtHCwfpPGtjIow8kzgCtr3Fkt7mNm ylunu7hktkBWF0X5dAPpOkeRg6MI1gRl7ZDDp6yMeG5zwoTGH5ibcQhQ5OWCSy1BDaz/ E0TY+2fQWec9Y9KFBRf3tO4ZcbCEPObzUdZZYbpzqWal8IJNftU4OSHlpX3AWixDtibf JEgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HHH6Kqzbwn+qbkVGrFSaS91Azb8LE0gMSYOCXlC5j0g=; b=UaY7i1+YOkpXeRVJgS4UdcUQEgA8HJayYspREnv9PMs2LOsIyG0P5+yKauE32WQ2Ab 1iSFEnUEIXTckMgVjPBC5kuyWEFQ2e0196KWTwfnDvMu5akDa6NfXhXBPosZv5MDgiQU 8Z8mKt5J+F9ncCIBE+dCnWNmJvlvd4fas1gIBGH6adyZzaBax1EZhjUx9kf2HJ3LiexG EUacSRODS+1emyUgO9WBrpCeLoY8Ceg+g7AVGwiyulZM3xkkoeukhaDKQ5IeDxQskgFD RtA6dEbo1PE42/YAaMplL8I+bVGXRDU8Snvk0jBNoCXXJS5vOGurlT5T/+8pvyw5uNdH GHkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZj7Jf9zfvqPHpaQXNuz0rRZpF/kJu2mt+sGwZAKL+xCSNQZS13 YKbdA4Bh7zUEAGj14o0SqxTWnVzXzKPE8/9zuMaNYlV3
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIUXXCgm1wIdk/oNwLBuZ+Edyaj9QZg2fDumjy5Duand+aAOiPy+waUatzVnLOEm3NZSF9XNh6/2PEVNUAniYg=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5455:: with SMTP id d21mr20012221lfn.23.1588097517164; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CH2PR00MB06781CD67118A28C36F78B27F5AC0@CH2PR00MB0678.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-v1O1781w5=V-d9oBk4_RtbeVWy=VnrRbgvMN-Jbs5Fkw@mail.gmail.com> <CDB1365F-D192-4B49-B379-65ECF32F9AA9@gmail.com> <MN2PR00MB06883348AD3AC31B1A01EFD9F5AC0@MN2PR00MB0688.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CAD9ie-t+i=ur3Qju3GYReCLuCZeRNpObh-M8mik0ObdYha8THg@mail.gmail.com> <5f2a0446-9b87-3251-246f-5d7b84e9822a@danielfett.de> <CAD9ie-v5YTuUmkQXO0YvPePNb-eY2o6cb9WSZHibtgjZ4pPUcA@mail.gmail.com> <9938e1eb-c4d8-d842-d32f-3aac86f123eb@danielfett.de>
In-Reply-To: <9938e1eb-c4d8-d842-d32f-3aac86f123eb@danielfett.de>
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:11:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD9ie-v3sFuVbYJphPQAAeJQJZmOJGLfu-18sUywzN=n_Z70-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de>
Cc: txauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000611e3305a45dc4f3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/kHToIDXg90xr8_SrE-jLFWfFfas>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] Name criteria
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:12:01 -0000

But which languages are we checking? There are alot in the world. The
phonetics of the name could be offensive -- ie it could be an offensive
word when said in China or Japan. I don't know how to use google to
search phonetics.
ᐧ

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:01 AM Daniel Fett <fett@danielfett.de> wrote:

> Am 28.04.20 um 19:54 schrieb Dick Hardt:
>
> Daniel: I'm in favor of the intent of your suggestion -- but curious which
> languages we would test that in. Doing it for all languages is impractical.
> A negative connotation may also be a locale rather than language specific.
> For example, a fag in the UK (a cigarette) is very different than a fag in
> the US/Canada (offensive term for a homosexual man).
>
> If it is in the Urban Dictionary, it is probably a bad choice ;-)
>
> No, seriously, I guess we can just google for "<x> definition", "<x>
> translation" and see what comes up.
>
> -Daniel
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email