IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Fri, 01 July 2022 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D38C15AACA for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=hMLvTCOR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=sGN7CtIu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vc2zgNlYvibV for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EEE9C1594A9 for <uta@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 17:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E57632006F2; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 20:19:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 20:19:54 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1656634793; x=1656721193; bh=QEY1S2m920 8xU/Zn/utzU/8hqqjFJlYf+qB4O8DcdqM=; b=hMLvTCORu6mEy6uOE7bRPYYU96 yUPoZOI7x7wGnIJGQ/AxMzK/15AaiyZ0JC5uUf9paiY0FwL1ITE3j51K+s1KpyxF NxPrvbn4YCZ9lwPYwivz4/acOamqkmb73X4/QmA/gJddcq38jcY0cxMuGB60cmwb kF0iXxuBDW/gd1uYvIl/5JjNCxk2s/uj8Heu8ta2+Ny5WIkhi15N5iEPlH0Q0Wb4 tHYLBqck86RBah8Qx6MypU7ouK+ko+oqNgcxKYuPUcPmFvCXRzCYZMNpNOM6uxig IA8MSTwjgx67QA8eDXK7JnhHAxc82YDOQ9zjmS27j7MFGkB3u5+2eODRC8eQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1656634793; x=1656721193; bh=QEY1S2m9208xU/Zn/utzU/8hqqjF JlYf+qB4O8DcdqM=; b=sGN7CtIuyjgrhBK4KCEGiXmTRZWGIzlc54mPsgltEvc0 xhsJvnuJTzdq3iWAXb5o7l24HlWx50cWvyyr5FbR4MIKr+SotbObTdDnTLr13k3Y AxELc/abXGcjjqdQpqkJfQMLQgECYOP6ijr2BM4tiv8tcxW4bz2tRGyabad4P3Ok aHMdpCDBLZeL82hyB/835Fo343h6eMr53ugynKchrEv/WOiK0oxqYJ/QI/A2cm9G HlEfhIvDVgCd5S2AEyCj/e/u8R+5Lla95aJ2IEXB9yLsp1JBEaTs9lSukpAQRuqN FHn1K6qneCX2cRf8nPa4x7Srf5z+SPJwbILYLZ2E1Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:qD2-YtGC4Kok9lC2AEIkN6nEGmFTeucZWnDbQwtbvupVGZaxSCVLdg> <xme:qD2-YiWVwZVGRub8CtYJqT-HvhIF4iBQSzYekG84435DV20Em2H6NGKC8VLYafHMm AIgy-zeCkhQmUqmPIA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudehvddgfeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghr thhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeetueeikedtkeelfeekvefhkeffvedvvefgkefgleeugfdvjeej geffieegtdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:qT2-YvIW6Do2m2PWin7COpYCRI-pl9OBadLS0V5wFViai5IQmR6jsg> <xmx:qT2-YjGdauE4W7WlQpMDYn_cv0ZwuEYotFMxCxAoKCrML9dfLTulwg> <xmx:qT2-YjW4DmefAc2BrvDEy7GMy-IqebCS6sGsDfxcyaMe72WZGyGBcQ> <xmx:qT2-YkdgcoXVW1UXNkxy6lVXyM2rLeSEEmjsedcRdU58WtfKaZ3N8g>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id EC55F2340077; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 20:19:52 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-713-g1f035dc716-fm-20220617.001-g1f035dc7
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <28a04f4a-2763-4fb5-b240-733b72e065f9@beta.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b9f52107-4970-453d-a3ec-bf57e313af4d@stpeter.im>
References: <002e01d87e9c$78a002e0$69e008a0$@smyslov.net> <152a5c9d-3142-419e-81dd-aa19bc2c8a02@beta.fastmail.com> <A8121C94-7881-4BA1-8A3D-C70291020FA6@akamai.com> <53fb3bb0-6414-3e1b-5ef5-2204522528f8@stpeter.im> <ED51AE33-23D2-4D40-91CD-155877E0ABAC@akamai.com> <b9f52107-4970-453d-a3ec-bf57e313af4d@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 10:17:07 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/A2QYh4_ocEbfsEnKYlSMNNgs7XA>
Subject: Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:20:00 -0000

On Fri, Jul 1, 2022, at 03:17, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I believe this document could just point to the HTTP RFC as advise for protocols that support IP addresses, as I have also said.
>
> That might work.

I could live with that if there is pushback on a more complete change.

That said, I don't think that the document is about domain names.  It includes discussion of SRV-ID and URI-ID.  So it is about validating reference identities.  It also exists to address a need, and people do find themselves forced to use IP addresses sometimes.  I'd hazard that IP-ID is more common than SRV-ID/URI-ID.

(If anything this is an argument to change the name to "Validating Application Service Identities".)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email