IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 29 June 2022 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D804C1594A9 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 06:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.745, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHwzHNeDpxN7 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 06:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33D64C157B4D for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 06:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25TBhFOi011750; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:16:25 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=si1awrkc5zY29M+25sRAl4zXYOl/jPOdgzIZJbiqqZY=; b=b5M9aHxXkXfHn6hH0kkmWbBjk+DklObLj/Bu0CFFaBpCCt4+wlMmrkWxr97Kw9Vn3sfC DGXWpON1/X2pCMxU6ew0vnzCHUUDGYqc4+ZWh1Nui2W4KjhR7vUW96dggv1YIUeVvSyU q4S9bj+jlh4XCcDJIGrJqQxiI5S81UHrKH10fLaR8kuABZdC7dz7eLpr4i6rv947TO4k KVkrORa0BpMmSMcXfaEQmt3ZSpwMcVjISedRRdgoObA5gsMBHq9xTwG+3yChQLkPdNqq DlPrR1sPg/fhuCR948yul/5sf57+8ezf4jmlYFGSWROoOlzxr3IDcsmPqD/2vNNHAUwn gg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a72-247-45-31.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.31] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3h04bcbrm9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:16:25 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25TAfoPX028636; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:16:25 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.205]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gy6pdmx2t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:16:24 -0400
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) by ustx2ex-dag4mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.200) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.26; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 08:16:24 -0500
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) with mapi id 15.02.0986.026; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 06:16:24 -0700
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06
Thread-Index: AQHYi1OONsfNlikUQICzeXBktMWF+61mkH0A
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 13:16:24 +0000
Message-ID: <A8121C94-7881-4BA1-8A3D-C70291020FA6@akamai.com>
References: <002e01d87e9c$78a002e0$69e008a0$@smyslov.net> <152a5c9d-3142-419e-81dd-aa19bc2c8a02@beta.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <152a5c9d-3142-419e-81dd-aa19bc2c8a02@beta.fastmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.61.22050700
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8A09017FEDA1EE48B80EDC80C9FAF596@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-06-29_17,2022-06-28_01,2022-06-22_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=610 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206290047
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: TdqVXO8-Xbt2hio2OGf8gvPos4SDLVlX
X-Proofpoint-GUID: TdqVXO8-Xbt2hio2OGf8gvPos4SDLVlX
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-06-29_17,2022-06-28_01,2022-06-22_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=591 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206290048
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/YKR81jzo6aKGK08i-yugzdHt8vg>
Subject: Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 13:16:33 -0000

Re: https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9110.html#https.ip-id

6125-bis has always been solely about names, specifically fully-qualified domain names. It has not been explicitly discussed, but I think the WG understanding is as I just described it.

Looking at the section above, I don't see what 6125bis should have.  I can only think of this in "Out of Scope" section 1.4.2:
	Identifiers other than FQDNs. Identifiers such as IP address are not discussed.
	New>> Protocols other than HTTP may want to consider {{RFC9110, Section 4.3.5}} as a validation model. <<new

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email