Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 04 July 2022 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44821C15A75F; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 08:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.982
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.982 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oc90Aaj_8LtH; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 08:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92210C15A725; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 08:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1656948208; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=vfPrJkmkWKYLnhOv7rpiCJ/gGy9E+wqRS33G9+okTco=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=uRpKKqf/VXlKp9Zils6Z0wzi/iNm9I6Em2TNNzVkStC/cruKr8lHTVhpvnKf7+hmykxDBE SRsFL27shXmNgZ2d41Pq1H0YoohtS3FZa+jt0gS9fiUe23pIzxqlj0woaZew9O7DaJclsd PUhIgiJO00AZDJqC9AA/cF1OwSx0vb4=;
Received: from [192.168.1.222] (host31-49-219-71.range31-49.btcentralplus.com [31.49.219.71]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <YsMF7wBpXQtZ@waldorf.isode.com>; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 16:23:28 +0100
Message-ID: <d13eb377-e4fc-371a-3e45-3be85ec4b571@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 16:23:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
To: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>, uta@ietf.org, draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis@ietf.org
Cc: uta-chairs@ietf.org
References: <002e01d87e9c$78a002e0$69e008a0$@smyslov.net> <049b01d88faf$52cf0f60$f86d2e20$@gmail.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <049b01d88faf$52cf0f60$f86d2e20$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/xozkKZoNoreI8Tdol60s3NKlwJY>
Subject: Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 15:23:34 -0000

Hi,

My apologies for late response. I read the document and I generally 
found it in a good state and thus support its publication. I have one 
minor comment:

2nd paragraph of 6.4 reads:


    These identifiers provide an application service type portion to be
    checked, but that portion is combined only with the DNS domain name
    portion of the SRV-ID or URI-ID itself.  For example, if a client's
    list of reference identifiers includes an SRV-ID of _xmpp-
    client.im.example.org and a DNS-ID of apps.example.net, the client
    MUST check both the combination of an application service type of
    xmpp-client and a DNS domain name of im.example.org and a DNS domain
    name of apps.example.net.

I found the part "and a DNS domain name of apps.example.net." to be 
confusing, as I initially read it as "the combination of an application 
service type ... and a DNS domain name of apps.example.net.", which is 
not the case according to the following sentence.

So I suggest either removing this part, or changing it to something like 
" and, separately, a DNS domain name of apps.example.net.".

    However, the client MUST NOT check the
    combination of an application service type of xmpp-client and a DNS
    domain name of apps.example.net because it does not have an SRV-ID of
    _xmpp-client.apps.example.net in its list of reference identifiers.

>> Hi,
>>
>> this message starts a Working Group Last Call for
>> draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/
>>
>> The WGLC will last for two weeks and will end June the 27th.
>> Please send your comments to the list before this date.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Leif & Valery.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Uta mailing list
>> Uta@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> Uta@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta