IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 29 June 2022 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C5AC15AADE for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=mqHy0q28; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=OnVzDwWt
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b8MML_It5xrp for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74096C15AAEF for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4DD5C0579; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:03:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:03:31 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1656536611; x= 1656623011; bh=osE7H9WVZ4Fa5p6Z2c0yCKCi8bNCQtzhMp2qNK5fdxA=; b=m qHy0q28w1eSzgECM9krBgOSk+npbVa7SEjQvLPY/cGq2KH7LOHDtlnEeU+m37QTA 5v61WT5k9Q5mV64H7l3/ZmljTjkmLaFyRrM9qL6lGwxwF0mcAceNvxktUVcF6Lxj +ESGUxd/hs4OhACr+bqLhRNWGACUOPQzR0CFbmiFtJf9CuBrof3i0cC61S1H97j/ M8k0f3HsfICuW26EHB7esG8EuMHjsnTZYIDPeoM7CbKygP6+YChX+rXq1tKnp2Ai 2BCaaEyQOUkfYk671PQzeEczMHkDs4TXrYzrn+5CcegL2k/Y99bpxAO2LAC8R0R5 +Jl54GqVtFsculkmh+ahA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1656536611; x=1656623011; bh=o sE7H9WVZ4Fa5p6Z2c0yCKCi8bNCQtzhMp2qNK5fdxA=; b=OnVzDwWtJ2Iu0+oJ6 1Sx9/hu0H68Kvfys0Kmdmke/+O4O+iqSteCo1ZJxAEjafjYUgZojW8OzBrweLpnc 26vxFFR748xwkv1gMEXm2a45hRw1Sk4plb1xmL705XDkuZRpFWPRZ8N2feBeTvXO 5aVkcRyjEdFkqCUDJMVqBvGsTqmOb4DnmpCg2qPdfG6rai8QSDHd8lchRRnsie0a 9BRWkXAN5uH+4JpDbg+g69IKZboFSwUFe3gjVD585jB63Yu3Yq5WCsTOE5p0bpBa q0sKYJKdAtQEkuul3YnWJJhMi6Y8QEVzVC2szcZQS+c8ZQ1EzWCtH+xdb4JWuZix RL5vg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:I768YspjNpUj8XjOlI6KkvaFFthMneV_w97L5KKVsubCwmPUl22sRA> <xme:I768YioV_tc9f64VQG0TMviqoNnnuGBglYbgTWlnOGN-jNzBRlMIAr0ABW5DyVYW8 Phybg7qqgMFaisZsg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:I768YhMXSyQZ6yZiEekuMrov-TR-TPR80yCwPyA_V7Qj_vmP3_0rGPz7CAX7>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudegledgudehiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefrvght vghrucfurghinhhtqdetnhgurhgvuceoshhtphgvthgvrhesshhtphgvthgvrhdrihhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgieeghfeitdegvdetieffjefgfedvveeiteekveffffet hfduuddtuefgkeehjeenucffohhmrghinhephhhtthhpfihgrdhorhhgpdehrghsrghvrg hlihgurghtihhonhhmohguvghlrdhnvgifnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepshhtphgvthgvrhesshhtphgvthgvrhdrihhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:I768Yj5RG-_0Ee_jeUTiPe8olURK_77236ucJdI8f0cJIqzlGB6uLg> <xmx:I768Yr4PCz9tTPZmSlKbX-w6coUhFI58-6DdilWsdvEXNiO5lTw5zQ> <xmx:I768YjgE6Y9KHPiuAlv2u8wCj_JYALUvZIEeBbj-di0F2Ltr_YWfWg> <xmx:I768YrEWdQRhcYjo6ygqeRqSQBBW1CedU_BiuLrUcPtzMPs2y8sLyg>
Feedback-ID: i24394279:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:03:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <53fb3bb0-6414-3e1b-5ef5-2204522528f8@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:03:30 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
References: <002e01d87e9c$78a002e0$69e008a0$@smyslov.net> <152a5c9d-3142-419e-81dd-aa19bc2c8a02@beta.fastmail.com> <A8121C94-7881-4BA1-8A3D-C70291020FA6@akamai.com>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <A8121C94-7881-4BA1-8A3D-C70291020FA6@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/jKCdnu0neG_871RL7J_jyzi1xrQ>
Subject: Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:03:39 -0000

On 6/29/22 7:16 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Re: https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9110.html#https.ip-id
> 
> 6125-bis has always been solely about names, specifically fully-qualified domain names. It has not been explicitly discussed, but I think the WG understanding is as I just described it.
> 
> Looking at the section above, I don't see what 6125bis should have.  I can only think of this in "Out of Scope" section 1.4.2:
> 	Identifiers other than FQDNs. Identifiers such as IP address are not discussed.
> 	New>> Protocols other than HTTP may want to consider {{RFC9110, Section 4.3.5}} as a validation model. <<new

I think Martin is suggesting that we add the matching rule to 6125bis:

   A reference identity of type IP-ID matches if the address is
   identical to an iPAddress value of the subjectAltName extension of
   the certificate.

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email