IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Thu, 30 June 2022 04:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DC6C15CF51 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.127
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.127 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=uXbbPz7i; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=gt5Khrht
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0KJ1KcB7XJDG for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31D02C15CF4B for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED23C5C019E; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:32:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:32:33 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1656563553; x=1656649953; bh=bHQsC6OfsN 3uDbmmfxPcTFDaLbHiag09yaYLJU+ee8A=; b=uXbbPz7iZ1gXN1eFAx72f8DNwW KOZVFxoaBYJ7CLMNALNISUXFUzcMfDl4KBXLmtDHW7nijfLTmsaZL4m7mhZ8dyaH LxFLmP9MOSAbDtDlA3f8by3tnu3DuqjbrDt+t8WT9cnv1aR0FoYl59HhD1iPjRGc i+Y/JYmxXqZnlpaF3ny7O+WpfNzmrpKuw4bV2JUu/qSJvyTitOWXPY8mGQb9pCvE 2Pgf3gs0NjLbPUboqxEbXUz2gR7Ir+6KGNjB5T4yW/k3dJGrnGQlBWx4+nHjZPtK 7fCbxavO3PlIQ8g3PS9gMF1JlKqdWd1B1J0AaYrT6LjLHhhzbFL0wr6q6FJw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1656563553; x=1656649953; bh=bHQsC6OfsN3uDbmmfxPcTFDaLbHi ag09yaYLJU+ee8A=; b=gt5KhrhtWq898lsTeHUi8uH4dxDyONqe1zVhlD3r332I AFoJz5fWCCKU5QF8ELLrBrAHjW6aq4aIMDiicpi0yVBzjd4DZs5Xm6l63pm4owLz SSYYgnhOUbai9fiWIeaL7oeqHBrO5G0MhQ0NyKxUdsuYxLoO1MZ3Zd/i8SnbdEdE VpGE2WCwGruDfO919SkC7RiN7QOhCuM+LLS/hCaM5UoaJ4jhf94sYl7nTxNK8Aph nRDPWj3i1s6d/fCW3NFZKw8WeveAdXkMegoEq1UwHs+0iP/G2LLs3OimmzlO+jR+ KPZ60nJ1606UqG+zSCm/8TEHJSXA0L8FPZ9Osz43Fg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:YSe9Yh39zRhaX4HdOzUoS5ANFBbzI2KEwM6UhXXikQl-35c8paYB5w> <xme:YSe9YoHvzmUw2aSp_oIZnTjXdXs5YVkRIc85cX5kvDpdQBRbBJfd2KaSYsINRknZY 8bOHzneTaoqoQ4nq_U>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudehtddgkeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghr thhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeetueeikedtkeelfeekvefhkeffvedvvefgkefgleeugfdvjeej geffieegtdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:YSe9Yh44luQmGdzMoN8CVXPnPt6MNjPu42JYkE2YBInJUS5ezvv7bQ> <xmx:YSe9Yu1E7E4LixvA7Sh7QQmjnOIUhD1HEHXKqhyzyjV1RGuaKujtZw> <xmx:YSe9YkELRi0h2csymazPO31x1AqDraixRq0oguBWHPlzxv7NgafZbw> <xmx:YSe9YvP62qp5t2m7u5NZPEuXlMt5cx851Ak5yM_A79WE5kIBqajaiQ>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6219B2340077; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:32:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-713-g1f035dc716-fm-20220617.001-g1f035dc7
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <e1a58493-62a7-48f2-8814-411f9fb1ab7d@beta.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <53fb3bb0-6414-3e1b-5ef5-2204522528f8@stpeter.im>
References: <002e01d87e9c$78a002e0$69e008a0$@smyslov.net> <152a5c9d-3142-419e-81dd-aa19bc2c8a02@beta.fastmail.com> <A8121C94-7881-4BA1-8A3D-C70291020FA6@akamai.com> <53fb3bb0-6414-3e1b-5ef5-2204522528f8@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:32:15 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/rhoq7shPTEA0ew4J6SzrvOZ1aIQ>
Subject: Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 04:32:39 -0000

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022, at 07:03, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I think Martin is suggesting that we add the matching rule to 6125bis:
>
>    A reference identity of type IP-ID matches if the address is
>    identical to an iPAddress value of the subjectAltName extension of
>    the certificate.

That's about it.  Though there is probably a *tiny* bit more work to do that just that one sentence :)

It's OK if this is out of scope, but as that makes the document that little bit further from what is generally practiced, it might be better to do the work; that's all.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email