Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Wed, 06 July 2022 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6048AC14CF1D; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 22:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.126
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=P/v9yuqI; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=ds71ZMMF
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pP4XHHZ7y2lZ; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 22:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85568C157B43; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 22:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0525C0071; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 01:26:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 Jul 2022 01:26:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1657085205; x=1657171605; bh=Kc A2Q+iHuWmtlQBhQi0eWGdgZBMETNjamtm7jo2s9z8=; b=P/v9yuqIuKPOLjLx6n zYPDoajLzXsGUKLVImeOL3x1jwYmHRffTAAFwgX589VPc/0fLNzkqH+dDa9fO7Ir aWmjvXKHrmpbc2jxWJeuFRE4pedJkKuGFlmAS1rOXlZyb+FVnl9fM14MH2/lvpuB MQ9N7a3hlGyMZ+ADx1HBDQ7km8H7fZpGtfWdVjkgIK67QoIQRxfaDHIBLiQ5fxlS dIsHBxp+r2NlFSsDuvhSBPBjd7Gb59tn0fJ0SZ8P/pIubWZpUTTo+GE06RmPNf3w wod76WLYBq9YEykpBSRGu4wueZZVF6PdefJfG4mTAl/L2FHeBxN1xnzmRypQpL5t F2Gg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1657085205; x=1657171605; bh=KcA2Q+iHuWmtlQBhQi0eWGdgZBME TNjamtm7jo2s9z8=; b=ds71ZMMFKxAdkJt0ue2kJgsCK6p62BiblbmccM7vbRon jnWbHG5tRwQd6fk83/3eF/BAkARIh/TPKcS7OzgdOzqDCFUgGoQdK43BOgqja3I5 6mrSNQWL2LZcWyjcz4ZeWuA1/crEpuGBEV2O1yIogC7LB7xlGLcTLH4bO5Jwc+GI fJoWNpxlN536fU9D2YLCsP1GE7eqtyhuAvpCwqN/t6clHtuEZlmRIgBSj+JUJdVU XEOY1itXSWDQAxAQAMXfc4dVwoMrfhHWldWnvRi6s2DZU06YJdBxeCWn5hG6ll5A 1P3ut1xdbTEzPkt7KSvQcYx/rSaDFHophCwd5aGMGQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:FR3FYj3rVWESRzP0ZiDVK3O9kdc1kODN4XT7gkJ1b7I3W7iq5C7_Gw> <xme:FR3FYiETIK02xYhXlSJEB9r8JngOeCF3gSshAUhczISigZkF6u_JwikXlxQpNds6w dV_m558apv2ynDvcMY>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudeivddgledvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgr rhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtheevieeuffeghfduiefhleeggfeuhfetfedugfetjefhuedv heelveegleelgeenucffohhmrghinhephhhtthhprhhftggrshgrughvihhsvghfohhrph hrohhtohgtohhlshhthhgrthhsuhhpphhorhhtihhprgguughrvghsshgvshdrihhsnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehloh ifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:FR3FYj4jpL9_V2R4chlJVHqHpgqTPHuqTC8iFQlZwmmlapvg6u5Uyw> <xmx:FR3FYo0hmJbcYlaSiuyUbrgU51kQmx5hhYtBLvusKqT8ipHiwPekOw> <xmx:FR3FYmG7Kj2wjfpg1pL7YeaFZrLmTHudeczR4agXryWwms9Irl2x5g> <xmx:FR3FYrRzs32lR5bGIvSKa00ORcm-9fNvj0H-uHRjOpSSV9E5Xm1h9w>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8E9232340083; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 01:26:45 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-713-g1f035dc716-fm-20220617.001-g1f035dc7
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <617eb543-e898-4716-8bda-77000e6d55b7@beta.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <03e601d88d54$65876150$309623f0$@gmail.com>
References: <002e01d87e9c$78a002e0$69e008a0$@smyslov.net> <152a5c9d-3142-419e-81dd-aa19bc2c8a02@beta.fastmail.com> <A8121C94-7881-4BA1-8A3D-C70291020FA6@akamai.com> <53fb3bb0-6414-3e1b-5ef5-2204522528f8@stpeter.im> <ED51AE33-23D2-4D40-91CD-155877E0ABAC@akamai.com> <03e601d88d54$65876150$309623f0$@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 15:26:30 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, uta@ietf.org
Cc: uta-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/z_YeTAT0KEwxU_lwAIvtZuNFcZE>
Subject: Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 05:26:52 -0000

On Sat, Jul 2, 2022, at 00:11, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> The chairs think that the rough consensus is to limit the scope of the 
> draft to domain names
> (with the pointer to the HTTP RFC as advise for protocols that support 
> IP addresses).

Is this the consensus of the chairs, or was there some discussion that I missed?

I agree that there is no consensus to include changes, but I don't see any input other than from Rich (and I guess now yourself).