IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Wed, 29 June 2022 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AC2C15AD2D for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 18:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=yHm4+4In; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=QT5mkh+e
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Zc4c5NGWQcl for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 18:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F8ACC159493 for <uta@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 18:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19003200916 for <uta@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:00:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:00:19 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1656464418; x=1656550818; bh=pCT1Cz59St VGAbGAwLar6FbJB+9utRkvZy21axyJ+8Q=; b=yHm4+4InE3356PYdAbC+26ykrY jSJ9EJIt2eUGCvFW/NH6sJ/FGTUXKc9wVumrqfqJLhnOLZe88+Kicd54kSRTFz/h 88tqWTJonW1MWXR14Xzz3hr3HUBTZgsh/z/BEgENKzsCtCrHbJqR6dJO20GZ+d+b cuPU0p04BTZBC7Izi75C9t8Y2VBMItWaAImPcHjoSJWWAnn17ZR4fXXyxbMMMlAO 5wCyRO3fn5o7PKbu5J6MYgarRzkSDi+LKo9eJRH4j/ZgVbvcnSInBRRw4ji0P7OJ j9H+QDZDXDzFlO8j11oMv/ZwIoZBml2tfphQ+EJYT/ZU0YfkCqSYdBCZRCAg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1656464418; x=1656550818; bh=pCT1Cz59StVGAbGAwLar6FbJB+9u tRkvZy21axyJ+8Q=; b=QT5mkh+ePMSTRfuiCl1plyLwbqcYP4BJXRghqOThCI3N fsL+wrPSwGWRBQzPOPKXiinj2vQvqZnS4hhxGeeI3IexSf6ZlMeFhvNrrt3apbSt f4vQMwlxpEVLKQwublp83JbUh6QHyHeSOl5ov7QlMT41DbwsMTkSwncnh885T7sR KLIrST8nkd1HnXpNKlKc4z+H8BAm1xjcycuJiB6/OkBYU2j/yIS6j8lONe5nbBjb jo6cEOP1zAQtwHuzaU20I9/tWzKBeqY8qQ/DsM4QnTdcP/O9sleYCYXGacVnP64T QHjjRTevRMdk6y/lk6PdX5myIpsnL1Wd2iXBwgImbw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:IqS7YtPoeQOXyT60XVNhTORzuQM7jNPqEgyqBWeT2Hft9NqHy8Xvfw> <xme:IqS7Yv_Pj-YxbjOysbEL6krdDjtP5JhiAxzIdd5n9nQ6y0XwTZV20LOcopuHBXo83 Y9oMyn9OO-SCo8z9bc>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudegkedggedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhho figvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekudelveffgfekjefgke dtveeufeevtdevueehveetvdejfeeigefgheekgeehtdenucffohhmrghinhephhhtthhp fihgrdhorhhgpdhivghtfhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:IqS7YsQBjzj986484NSMkKo08ppIniMdkh0bE_HUjvEBVUE_WS9Ipw> <xmx:IqS7YptEDW5on17yPWNtjHIUMJeYq1F74E1fo85aMRiLEFnLBMqB9Q> <xmx:IqS7Ylc8caw-BkV7OB3h6lnkiqGePcsuke9OxYnrFfYxtebLa9Ed1w> <xmx:IqS7Yvp6IWqxkfy4HyWUWWJMBqzvJKkugOhHhrYJKPZP7n1n2KhZRQ>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 463822340077; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:00:18 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-713-g1f035dc716-fm-20220617.001-g1f035dc7
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <152a5c9d-3142-419e-81dd-aa19bc2c8a02@beta.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <002e01d87e9c$78a002e0$69e008a0$@smyslov.net>
References: <002e01d87e9c$78a002e0$69e008a0$@smyslov.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:59:59 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: uta@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/leg93HZvkt82qDYG4mDc81SdRqc>
Subject: Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 01:00:26 -0000

I realize that this WGLC deadline passed, but maybe I can exploit the fact that discussion is continuing to ask for one last change (apologies for not writing this up sooner, I haven't been following closely).

RFC 9110 Section 4.3.5 (https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9110.html#https.ip-id) contains a new type of reference identity.  This reference identity type is widely supported, but RFC 6125 didn't cover it.

Is there any chance that the text in RFC 9110 that I reference could be included in this revision.  It would do a lot of good for this document to be the definitive reference here and missing IP-ID is a bit of a hole.

I appreciate that this is quite late as a scope change.  If this has been discussed, I'll let this lie, but the (already excellent) document would be better and more usable with this change.

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022, at 06:39, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this message starts a Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/
>
> The WGLC will last for two weeks and will end June the 27th.
> Please send your comments to the list before this date.
>
> Regards,
> Leif & Valery.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> Uta@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email