Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 22 June 2015 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96FF1ACE1A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fGs1CCDh08UA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAEC11ACE20 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 08:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id t5MFLA3e024491 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:21:10 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 9168D202CD5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:24:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F531202A54 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:24:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id t5MFL7kQ008707 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:21:10 +0200
Message-ID: <558827E2.9000104@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:21:06 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <E1C235B5-1421-4DAF-A2F3-F963982233DF@apple.com> <5587EFDD.6030807@gmail.com> <5587F54A.9050406@sunriseroad.net>
In-Reply-To: <5587F54A.9050406@sunriseroad.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/29XCifuIRi8Rk03K3WUz48SQYTs>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:21:18 -0000


Le 22/06/2015 13:45, Jeremy Visser a écrit :
> On 22/06/15 21:22, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>> It is better to tell the operator to provide a /63 to smartphones
>> (not a /64), with DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation.  That will fix it.
>
> Why stop at /63?

I think cellular network architects are reluctant to leap from 64 to 63. 
  Once that leap is overcome the other prefix lenghs are just small steps.

> If you can think of a use for two subnets, I can think of a use for
> three.  Or four.  Or sixteen.  Or two hundred and fifty-six...

YEs, in a sense.

Alex
>
> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
>