Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 24 June 2015 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEDA1A1A67 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 03:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qs7wNwS0jGuU for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 03:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E0091A1A47 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 03:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id t5OAcPE2012377 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:38:25 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id CE1A0202192 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:41:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC844200F68 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:41:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id t5OAcL0M004482 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:38:25 +0200
Message-ID: <558A889D.8030006@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:38:21 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <E1C235B5-1421-4DAF-A2F3-F963982233DF@apple.com> <5587EFDD.6030807@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506221415100.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAAedzxo7Cqxwrp_zViDhOhWc+dtcy9M9=a-FjW7M8APNx7VUQA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506241138340.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506241138340.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/8k7_VDVU85zZZeSCw5wdOtI0NFA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:38:29 -0000


Le 24/06/2015 11:41, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Erik Kline wrote:
>
>>> DHCPv6-PD exists in recent 3GPP documents, but vendor implementation
>>> of this is not wide-spread. We do *not* want to gate IPv6 rollout in
>>> mobile networks on this functionality. Yes, we want it, but we can't
>>> wait for it.
>>
>> (off-topic: So, are you saying that DT is most definitely not blocked
>> on DHCPv6-PD as far as enabling IPv6 on LTE is concerned?)
>
> Re-reading my sentence above I agree it can be interpreted as me
> speaking for DT as whole. That was not my intention. I have no recent
> information as to what the current state of IPv6 rollout is in DT
> Germany mobile network.
>

DHCPv6-PD in recent 3GPP documents is between entities within the core 
network.  The 3GPP specs dont tell DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation towards the 
UE.  The UE in 3GPP specs does not implement DHCPv6 PD.

What is the status of DT IPv6 trials - do they exist?

Alex