Re: [v6ops] Happy eyeballs suggestions, was: Re: Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 25 June 2015 02:59 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127BC1A903C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 19:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rjVkhXO0U67A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 19:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3691A8FD5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 19:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 476EEA1; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:59:02 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1435201142; bh=szoXJe6ecea8ykG9/VOVeWIB0H75wbP++z4uS3IABt0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CoJA8a+AUp5UgcGWiKg1H6D/ZhSCYx7cYKcbVj+Mlqznm8ClX/KofSELajsH1bNzd 8UdseNQOY5M/krp757hdlc20dFFtGvgFhXtTZYIvG9/qGMIArGVCabIbA67ZNEDEfn UgtbNG1xQqRYZk8e54Qb98olh5GsGLinvw7pqn/0=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2249F; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:59:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:59:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <272BEF29-C175-4889-8119-8544084E9C1F@nestlabs.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506250456050.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <E1C235B5-1421-4DAF-A2F3-F963982233DF@apple.com> <90744458-CA06-4347-A96B-D649800855D3@muada.com> <CAKC-DJhQ3kSPtkVHoPxtiUO-CbQkymehDF735nr8Q6=EUdUz0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1068D9DB-4300-473F-B511-880C1E9FB73D@muada.com> <78ABF014-6E93-40B8-8ABC-5BAF8AF96A47@nestlabs.com> <27D48517-5882-4E0A-9288-814D07C607C0@muada.com> <9AFFDD3E-4D15-45CC-A80A-C87A671F0D2E@nestlabs.com> <CAD6AjGRyvE7VQODo20Sf9ErsHzrUESWbiSrz3hvKgcg25_JJ7g@mail.gmail.com> <F5C485F2-8AE4-4097-943D-4956F2FFAE7D@eircom.net> <272BEF29-C175-4889-8119-8544084E9C1F@nestlabs.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-137064504-1404771655-1435201142=:9487"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/gc86DjuJ41EmAfnj4nB7ITNENBM>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Happy eyeballs suggestions, was: Re: Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 02:59:06 -0000

On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, james woodyatt wrote:

> Another aggravation regarding IPv6-only APNs on iOS is that an unlocked 
> iPhone is unable to use an IPv6-only APN. The only way in iOS to control 
> the type of the APN is with a provisioning profile, and these are not 
> used on unlocked phones.

I don't know what you mean by "provisioning profile", but my wifes 
unlocked iPhone6+ received an update to her carrier profile with iOS 8.3 
and it used the IPv4v6 APN just fine without any kind of user 
intervention.

> influence with Apple Core OS Engineering that their demands have some 
> hope of sticking could complain to them about this? It’s the reason I 
> can’t use IPv6 APNs when I’m traveling on a foreign SIM card. I know, I 
> know, like there is such a carrier who has any interest in seeing 
> unlocked phones have any more useful features.

Well, the major thing here is Apple controls and approves the profile, not 
the carrier. There are plenty of carriers who are interested but who have 
to convince Apple to get changes done.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se