Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 24 June 2015 09:41 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11BE1B32CE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 02:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zRU_ryYo4AvP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 02:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B14371B325E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 02:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 99B10A1; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:41:11 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1435138871; bh=m8wDenU7KL5rTbuw9wspup7SEU/vYkuZiFcdhVjZB+4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KWMRjnz9311qLvpATjaUsiShBjG4qBtYLY25qsY+VO9pjy7oTy3o86pG3DVZzlTJj O2bLaI0L+hV/L3UISd6qWtpYqPbibKg1h7KwgxslzhKov3F8LAJExm1OCnnOJOsjqy 0hO+EIptwkPUI7zgGuEibRQiHwiYl6jNGQmlMWVU=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A039F; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:41:11 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 11:41:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxo7Cqxwrp_zViDhOhWc+dtcy9M9=a-FjW7M8APNx7VUQA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506241138340.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <E1C235B5-1421-4DAF-A2F3-F963982233DF@apple.com> <5587EFDD.6030807@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506221415100.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAAedzxo7Cqxwrp_zViDhOhWc+dtcy9M9=a-FjW7M8APNx7VUQA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QCL8pK_VzY1onN-ypuJZ54aS8wg>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - 64share
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:41:19 -0000

On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Erik Kline wrote:

>> DHCPv6-PD exists in recent 3GPP documents, but vendor implementation of 
>> this is not wide-spread. We do *not* want to gate IPv6 rollout in 
>> mobile networks on this functionality. Yes, we want it, but we can't 
>> wait for it.
>
> (off-topic: So, are you saying that DT is most definitely not blocked
> on DHCPv6-PD as far as enabling IPv6 on LTE is concerned?)

Re-reading my sentence above I agree it can be interpreted as me speaking 
for DT as whole. That was not my intention. I have no recent information 
as to what the current state of IPv6 rollout is in DT Germany mobile 
network.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se