Re: [v6ops] Happy eyeballs suggestions, was: Re: Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Mon, 22 June 2015 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651D21AD087 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X-F0CFCTDb7b for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (sequoia.muada.com [IPv6:2001:1af8:3100:a006:1::]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E464F1AD080 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.11] (5356AFE1.cm-6-7c.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.175.225]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id t5MKp0uC032961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:51:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKC-DJhQ3kSPtkVHoPxtiUO-CbQkymehDF735nr8Q6=EUdUz0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:51:53 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1068D9DB-4300-473F-B511-880C1E9FB73D@muada.com>
References: <E1C235B5-1421-4DAF-A2F3-F963982233DF@apple.com> <90744458-CA06-4347-A96B-D649800855D3@muada.com> <CAKC-DJhQ3kSPtkVHoPxtiUO-CbQkymehDF735nr8Q6=EUdUz0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/A7WJrH3-qWAhyQID1gIQHu-JUN4>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Vividh Siddha <vsiddha@apple.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Happy eyeballs suggestions, was: Re: Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:52:05 -0000

On 22 Jun 2015, at 18:53, Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org> wrote:

> Having the NAT64/DNS64 environment is great for IPv6-only testing, but if it doesn't provide the ability to get through to real IPv6 content/resources when the MacOS host has IPv6 connectivity (either natively or via a tunnel) then it could be counter-productive in some circumstances and could discourage app writers from developing their apps to work well in scenarios where true end-to-end IPv6 connectivity is possible.

Hm, what kind of stuff would work through NAT64 that wouldn't work with real IPv6 connectivity?

(Thinking of stuff that _would_ work with real IPv6 but not NAT64 is easier.)