Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - ND proxy for bridging hotspots

Gert Doering <> Thu, 25 June 2015 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D691A1BFF for <>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4TmS7t8sshCB for <>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E6AF1ACCE9 for <>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9BC62ED6 for <>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:14:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86D9660152 for <>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:14:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 7132 invoked by uid 1007); 25 Jun 2015 21:14:28 +0200
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:14:28 +0200
From: Gert Doering <>
To: Owen DeLong <>
Message-ID: <20150625191428.GJ67883@Space.Net>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - ND proxy for bridging hotspots
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 19:14:31 -0000


On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:08:14PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> If I want the phone to provide the connectivity to the car, I should be able
> to do that.
> If I want the car to provide connectivity and have the phone use that, I should
> be able to do that.
> I should be able to choose and I should be able to change my decision whenever
> it suits me.


For *you* this might make sense and be a useful feature.  For me, I might
like it, but will never actually use it (because I'm way too lazy to be
interested in multiple possible Internet uplinks for my car - and why I
should bother to trade the nice *external* antenna of the car with the
great reception of a typical smartphone inside a large moving metal box).

For the typical driver who is already challenged pairing his mobile via
BT with his car's handsfree?  No go.  Do one thing, do it well, and NEVER
ask a car owner (or any normal Internet user) about technical decisions.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279