Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 31 October 2011 01:51 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFDC21F8B16 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.225
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.774, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9jSJAwkSLgn5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AB021F891D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=5302; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1320025870; x=1321235470; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=votJFkoSxeR1TWVbKKO4bwGojnIvptiJtKEdqJm44Hw=; b=dqavg+gpI+pig4yDrREspPJEZBxZ+SxZSOsMQDzofxi+MAMXp2ul9ueJ FUjwAzX2o7mdwv5XYsGEjLY8FDbnNnNV1SKQQTbhGtOJzLWN6sx8QLhpT +YoUQQ/+OwFO7BT/DytObdUHbqEtQptwbM6wfi5hxEX3fC3jbgV3ftEt7 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAIT+rU6rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABDhHekSIEFgXIBAQEBAgEBAQELBAEQQgkLBQsJAhEDAQIBAgIjAwICJx8JCAYTCRmHYAiWAgGMSpBcgTCGPjNhBIgEjAqFLYw/
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,428,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="11291442"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2011 01:51:10 +0000
Received: from localhost (tky-vpn-client-231-191.cisco.com [10.70.231.191]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9V1p7NN024909; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 01:51:07 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by localhost (PGP Universal service); Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:51:08 +0900
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by localhost on Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:51:08 +0900
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EADD509.3090101@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:50:55 +0800
Message-Id: <7291EFAC-46CA-423F-B033-F9B0443CC014@cisco.com>
References: <519971001.31182@tju.edu.cn> <4EADD509.3090101@bogus.com>
To: Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 01:51:11 -0000

On Oct 31, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:

> On 10/30/11 03:32 , 孟少卿 wrote:
>> Hi all I also support draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-00.txt  to be
>> adopted as a WG document in V6ops. A special block of IPv4 address
>> mapping for  the non-directly translatable IPv6 address will  helpful
>> for us to troubleshoot. We have deployed the stateless translator for
>> about two years in the campus networks.
> 
> What addresses do you presentialy use a the source address for icmp
> messages sent from the stateless translator?

My understanding is that he doesn't - the message is dropped. The net effect in a traceroute (IPv4) is to see something that looks like a routing loop or a black hole on the far side (IPv6) of the translator. He'd like something that shows that distance is progressing and it's a state number of hops beyond the translator. It's not all the information one would like to see, but it's more and better than "* * *".

In the reverse direction, traceroute6 from the IPv6 side, the ICMP6 message can represent the IPv4 address as ::ipv4 or ::FFFF:ipv4. We see that in the wild now.

>> Best Regards Shaoqing Meng Tianjin University Information and Network
>> Center
>> 
>> -----邮件原件----- 发件人: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org
>> [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Xing Li 发送时间: 2011年10月24日 18:37 收件
>> 人: V6ops Chairs 抄送: v6ops@ietf.org WG 主题: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF
>> DRAFT Agenda
>> 
>> Hi, Fred and All,
>> 
>> 于 2011/10/14 5:52, Fred Baker 写道:
>>> The initial version of the agenda has been posted. It places v6ops
>>> on Wednesday and Friday mornings, a total of 4.5 hours. I
>>> personally am satisfied with it, but if folks have issues I can
>>> pass them along.
>>> 
>>> I'll note that the deadline for -00 drafts is 24 October, and the
>>> deadline for updated drafts is a week later. For discussion in the
>>> working group meetings, I'm looking for a draft posted after 25
>>> July, with supporting email discussion on the list.
>>> 
>>> I'm looking for (and in some cases have seen) commentary on each
>>> of:
>>> 
>>> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  13796 Jul 25 23:59 
>>> draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-00.txt
>> 
>> I would like to request that the V6ops WG adopt
>> draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-00.txt as a WG adoption.
>> 
>> The draft describes the operational considerations of mapping ICMPv6
>> packets through an RFC6145 gateway where the IPv6 address is not
>> directly translatable into an IPv4 address, and requests an IANA
>> Special Purpose IPv4 address allocation (192.70.192.0/24) to allow
>> this address mapping to take place using a protocol-specific
>> designated address block in IPv4.
>> 
>> The authors are hopeful that this will not require any valuable
>> face-to-face WG time at IETF 82 and the WG's consideration of this
>> document can be undertaken entirely on the mailing list.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> xing
>> 
>>> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  34974 Sep 14 10:45 
>>> draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-04.txt -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred
>>> 26625 Sep 27 13:22 
>>> draft-kuarsingh-v6ops-6to4-provider-managed-tunnel-04.txt 
>>> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  25341 Oct  2 11:39 
>>> draft-jjmb-v6ops-comcast-ipv6-experiences-02.txt -rw-rw-r--  1 fred
>>> fred  28127 Oct  6 14:13 
>>> draft-gashinsky-v6ops-v6nd-problems-00.txt -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred
>>> 45016 Oct  7 12:39 draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-00.txt -rw-rw-r--  1
>>> fred  fred   8877 Oct 10 09:00
>>> draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-discard-prefix-00.txt -rw-rw-r--  1 fred
>>> fred  15656 Oct 12 20:38 
>>> draft-carpenter-v6ops-label-balance-00.txt
>>> 
>>> plus any new drafts that are posted.
>>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>>> From: IETF Agenda<agenda@ietf.org> Date: October 13, 2011 2:13:10
>>>> PM PDT To: Working Group Chairs<wgchairs@ietf.org>
>>>> Cc:irsg@irtf.org Subject: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda
>>>> 
>>>> The DRAFT agenda is ready for viewing.  Please note the cutoff
>>>> date for requests to reschedule Working Group and BOF meetings is
>>>> October 17, 2011 17:00 PT.  The final agenda will be published on
>>>> October 21, 2011.
>>>> 
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/82/agenda.html 
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/82/agenda.txt
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/82/index.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks, Wanda
>>>> 
>>>> Only 30 days until Taipei, 82nd IETF! Online registration for the
>>>> IETF meeting is at: http://www.ietf.org/meeting/register.html
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list 
>>> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list 
>> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list 
>> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
>