IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda

Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com> Wed, 26 October 2011 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <bingxuere@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00F221F8AE1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.067
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.067 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.531, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G6QLcc9SNHLY for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F80221F8ADC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iabn5 with SMTP id n5so2168938iab.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=pmb/wzYSM84v6tOp9UsalVtFkOG7hY4XrU4P2CxcKfA=; b=k1cUMZz/U1/Se2pO8fNATRBQd1PnOzDRSqPSPVM9jR89sYHo+e8st0g8FBVcsyzt33 lP+5rymaLwjAxYLNM64KV9WuWD+7oY9m2g/bct8dpXTy7ZfS2jgwPYzeQfi31Fnd1ety YYgSByWj72TF+l8VElNG7Q/JFBnrc3vYJxF8U=
Received: by 10.42.161.70 with SMTP id s6mr51134336icx.40.1319632830091; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.219.194 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:39:50 +0800
Message-ID: <CAH3bfAAjE5qe1qnT+coT-JA4-_m+0szp5SMX_UX-s0vpzvF+=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="90e6ba2123e512513904b032f65d"
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:40:31 -0000

Hi, all,

I also support that draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-00.txt is now ready for
WG item. We have tested IVI/dIVI/dIVI-pd in China Telecom and it works very
well including ICMP packets.

Best wishes

Qiong

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email