Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 26 October 2011 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693C321F8ABB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 04:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IArvpxZmxkxB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 04:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vimes.kumari.net (vimes.kumari.net [198.186.192.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5429F21F84A0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 04:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [5.5.8.10] (vpn.snozzages.com [204.194.22.7]) by vimes.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCA601B408B3; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:32:37 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <4EA53FB7.6090603@cernet.edu.cn>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:32:35 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C8B7882E-F8F0-4E65-AC5C-D8CDA24DC0EC@kumari.net>
References: <20111013211312.B6C7421F8AFF@ietfa.amsl.com> <619C3B81-1CDC-4341-8180-EC8472864CC0@cisco.com> <4EA53FB7.6090603@cernet.edu.cn>
To: Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:32:41 -0000

On Oct 24, 2011, at 6:36 AM, Xing Li wrote:

> Hi, Fred and All,
> 
> 于 2011/10/14 5:52, Fred Baker 写道:
>> The initial version of the agenda has been posted. It places v6ops on Wednesday and Friday mornings, a total of 4.5 hours. I personally am satisfied with it, but if folks have issues I can pass them along.
>> 
>> I'll note that the deadline for -00 drafts is 24 October, and the deadline for updated drafts is a week later. For discussion in the working group meetings, I'm looking for a draft posted after 25 July, with supporting email discussion on the list.
>> 
>> I'm looking for (and in some cases have seen) commentary on each of:
>> 
>> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  13796 Jul 25 23:59 draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-00.txt
> 
> I would like to request that the V6ops WG adopt draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-00.txt as a WG adoption.
> 
> The draft describes the operational considerations of mapping ICMPv6 packets through an RFC6145 gateway where the IPv6 address is not directly translatable into an IPv4 address, and requests an IANA Special Purpose IPv4 address allocation (192.70.192.0/24) to allow this address mapping to take place using a protocol-specific designated address block in IPv4.
> 

Summary:
I support adoption.

More words: 
I must admit to being somewhat uncomfortable with the potential for using this space to hide that actual course of a DoS -- yes, this is somewhat addressed in the Security Considerations, but that doesn't actually remove the problem.
That said, the sad fact is that with so many networks not doing BCP38 you already have no faith in the source address of a packet IMO the benefits outweigh the risks.

W

> The authors are hopeful that this will not require any valuable face-to-face WG time at IETF 82 and the WG's consideration of this document can be undertaken entirely on the mailing list.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> xing
> 
>> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  34974 Sep 14 10:45 draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-04.txt
>> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  26625 Sep 27 13:22 draft-kuarsingh-v6ops-6to4-provider-managed-tunnel-04.txt
>> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  25341 Oct  2 11:39 draft-jjmb-v6ops-comcast-ipv6-experiences-02.txt
>> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  28127 Oct  6 14:13 draft-gashinsky-v6ops-v6nd-problems-00.txt
>> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  45016 Oct  7 12:39 draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-00.txt
>> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   8877 Oct 10 09:00 draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-discard-prefix-00.txt
>> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  15656 Oct 12 20:38 draft-carpenter-v6ops-label-balance-00.txt
>> 
>> plus any new drafts that are posted.
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: IETF Agenda<agenda@ietf.org>
>>> Date: October 13, 2011 2:13:10 PM PDT
>>> To: Working Group Chairs<wgchairs@ietf.org>
>>> Cc:irsg@irtf.org
>>> Subject: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda
>>> 
>>> The DRAFT agenda is ready for viewing.  Please note the cutoff date for
>>> requests to reschedule Working Group and BOF meetings is October 17, 2011
>>> 17:00 PT.  The final agenda will be published on October 21, 2011.
>>> 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/82/agenda.html
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/82/agenda.txt
>>> 
>>> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/82/index.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Wanda
>>> 
>>> Only 30 days until Taipei, 82nd IETF!
>>> Online registration for the IETF meeting is at:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/meeting/register.html
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops