Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda
Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net> Wed, 26 October 2011 20:04 UTC
Return-Path: <v6ops@globis.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C1A11E80A3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.338
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.338 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.340, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jguxdI5YSjaL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from globis01.globis.net (RayH-1-pt.tunnel.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f14:62e::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399A021F84B9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4403A870083; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:04:30 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at globis01.globis.net
Received: from globis01.globis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.globis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mrY-fa6-NCsu; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:04:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Rays-iMac.local (unknown [192.168.0.3]) (Authenticated sender: Ray.Hunter@globis.net) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 757F787007E; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:04:23 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4EA867C7.3050705@globis.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:04:23 +0200
From: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
User-Agent: Postbox Express 1.0.1 (Macintosh/20100705)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020305000803000805070407"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:04:35 -0000
I raised concerns about draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-00.txt when it was originally discussed on this list last July. The draft has not been updated since, so my concerns remain. There now seems to be a number of people on the list who see its benefit, and are supporting the draft. IMHO Due consideration should be made to weigh up the likely operational cost incurred because (many?) operators will have to change a lot of operational filters (to avoid the very likely abuse of this special range as a DDOS source) against the likely operational benefit for the (few?) operators who have applied this technology. There are alternatives available for address ranges to use as a source address of translations within the AS without assigning a new global special purpose range (either RFC1918, or a privately assigned block of public IPv4 addresses from existing space, which can be shared between operators). Admittedly the alternatives are not very attractive. But neither is the translation of ICMP messages into a packet that carries very little value or information when observed outside of its own AS, which is not traceable, and which could in fact become a danger thus triggering a need for mass packet filter updates. I asked at the time: can anyone think of any other example of a "one-way" special purpose packet that is allowed to leave the link, never mind the AS? RFC1918 addresses are not allowed to cross inter-enterprise links (for good reasons). Regards, RayH > Subject: > Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda > From: > Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> > Date: > Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:32:35 -0400 > > To: > Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn> > CC: > "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, V6ops Chairs > <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org> > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: > quoted-printable > Precedence: > list > MIME-Version: > 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) > References: > <20111013211312.B6C7421F8AFF@ietfa.amsl.com> > <619C3B81-1CDC-4341-8180-EC8472864CC0@cisco.com> > <4EA53FB7.6090603@cernet.edu.cn> > In-Reply-To: > <4EA53FB7.6090603@cernet.edu.cn> > Message-ID: > <C8B7882E-F8F0-4E65-AC5C-D8CDA24DC0EC@kumari.net> > Content-Type: > text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Message: > 1 > > > On Oct 24, 2011, at 6:36 AM, Xing Li wrote: > > >> > Hi, Fred and All, >> > >> > ? 2011/10/14 5:52, Fred Baker ??: >> >>> >> The initial version of the agenda has been posted. It places v6ops on Wednesday and Friday mornings, a total of 4.5 hours. I personally am satisfied with it, but if folks have issues I can pass them along. >>> >> >>> >> I'll note that the deadline for -00 drafts is 24 October, and the deadline for updated drafts is a week later. For discussion in the working group meetings, I'm looking for a draft posted after 25 July, with supporting email discussion on the list. >>> >> >>> >> I'm looking for (and in some cases have seen) commentary on each of: >>> >> >>> >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 fred fred 13796 Jul 25 23:59 draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-00.txt >>> >> > >> > I would like to request that the V6ops WG adopt draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-00.txt as a WG adoption. >> > >> > The draft describes the operational considerations of mapping ICMPv6 packets through an RFC6145 gateway where the IPv6 address is not directly translatable into an IPv4 address, and requests an IANA Special Purpose IPv4 address allocation (192.70.192.0/24) to allow this address mapping to take place using a protocol-specific designated address block in IPv4. >> > >> > > Summary: > I support adoption. > > More words: > I must admit to being somewhat uncomfortable with the potential for using this space to hide that actual course of a DoS -- yes, this is somewhat addressed in the Security Considerations, but that doesn't actually remove the problem. > That said, the sad fact is that with so many networks not doing BCP38 you already have no faith in the source address of a packet IMO the benefits outweigh the risks. > > W > >
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Joel jaeggli
- [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda t.petch
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Yu Guanghui
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Xing Li
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Li pengfei
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Zhankao WEN
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda clong_liu
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Qiong
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Xing Li
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Xing Li
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Joel jaeggli
- [v6ops] 答复: Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda 王竹威
- Re: [v6ops] draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address (was… George, Wes
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda buptnoc
- Re: [v6ops] 答复: Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda buptnoc
- [v6ops] 答复: Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda 孟少卿
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda 孟少卿
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda th@imu.edu.cn
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Jiang swall
- Re: [v6ops] 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Yu Guanghui
- Re: [v6ops] 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Yu Guanghui
- Re: [v6ops] 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Joel jaeggli
- [v6ops] 答复: Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda 孟少卿
- Re: [v6ops] 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Yu Guanghui
- Re: [v6ops] 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Yu Guanghui
- [v6ops] 答复: Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Justin Chen
- [v6ops] 答复: Fwd: 82nd IETF DRAFT Agenda Justin Chen