Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.12, <br>

Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Thu, 04 October 2018 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <miek@miek.nl>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A209128CF3 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:24:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=miek-nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yhc41w80hVgu for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B70912785F for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id q8-v6so10116741wmq.4 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=miek-nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=bywIKSKrOMVUymj/2SFse48QJDutV9Iz5LM4tcuHOas=; b=T0eGlRmO531TiY6kFLhYxtLh/fLqK4UetF2O+mTpm0DQbOSg+4FWG2UA2TC183ZzEJ 9UU71V+tD/nIYOAYqd9jrLce3JwimTkBNqK2M2HkeqzUqlr2TbdDgJXS4v5La0NYj3jm 7/THHkkrZAs50M67YJXPjC6mNVOPhmm03HOl3Eyqt5xeD/n0eH/uS6/v0I/xUwjZcAnF 13Vd1+pqnjQO5I7Naj+MPRGUm44jupsvqtT1F0IkV/+6pSY/zgtDM+L4Ra89MsZi2bNx x/QPqw9hjtQY6EFyMpjSXAfdfOx+fPEX8kQIwp58S5oLIVyxUJy5lGBQ5rBz94DdOM8+ Qj4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=bywIKSKrOMVUymj/2SFse48QJDutV9Iz5LM4tcuHOas=; b=ZDk2WRwedWHO6axChG3H4ebS4aA0GZLX/2osNMeiXXQ74l22WCKGy8A43S6vyYcmeW h/n88yhFToUro4bLUPjBoONqnNdihrTuFZYy5yLcsM7bcxr1SlniXVQpA4RI8GeXh9tz 3Jd2BeqdUjte3eywy2XYAfkrpjHqHXPaQTTBfMvWW8lyQCGnwHKVDjzst+tiRQR04vPZ pkBfkYgedjJRQA0xCijKnUhDgh2++fYOgFEWh13RmGakPrxE8zUkwER8kDWFVZVI8T5e a036VqUXgYlykO3JBzHmAbVxKFb+o9Na+abitAjou60zIEpNW9N4zOrUbIjSuPWPd9n2 gyAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoh+yl3NMzV5a4I54boljP88P5wISIvUOvWoK3lROE51tdO5FvUt j1fcfifwltFpkwy3yCwsT8Lx2g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60f2EhJfD4Ah31jOkoez8liqsoYoubrK2035AR/IZTIPueROHZXt2wkPEd/mgZ5U4VaD3KZvA==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c58b:: with SMTP id v133-v6mr3518790wmf.139.1538681065619; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 12:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miek.nl (4.3.8.0.6.9.c.b.e.5.6.a.1.b.f.a.f.3.c.4.9.5.f.b.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. [2001:8b0:bf59:4c3f:afb1:a65e:bc96:834]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 90-v6sm3568414wrg.86.2018.10.04.12.24.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Oct 2018 12:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 20:24:23 +0100
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, "xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org" <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20181004192423.xexbgomdqs56pkok@miek.nl>
References: <E1g6wQ8-00057n-85@durif.tools.ietf.org> <70ee4cff-7533-13e0-d71a-ffecf2dc56f0@gmx.de> <24828f94-dbbd-4c18-8d85-333487bda367@levkowetz.com> <3ac63652-2df2-03c7-eee6-bad2cbd326d8@levkowetz.com> <B63F3A7C-AAB6-4281-BC5F-BC28E9693E43@icann.org> <2ab7b797-4a01-5327-10fb-5ae13587944f@nostrum.com> <a9cbe9b1-1ee4-b60b-bb88-d07d11afa6a3@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a9cbe9b1-1ee4-b60b-bb88-d07d11afa6a3@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: http://www.miek.nl
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/5-EBeyutilmWsMDs7lNz1H_pnkg>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.12, <br>
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 19:24:29 -0000

[ Quoting <julian.reschke@gmx.de> in "Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #3..." ]
>On 10/4/2018 7:18 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
>>I didn't see a response to this.
>>
>>If we decide that preserving the "only in tables" idea, this avoids 
>>the argument about causing authors unnecessary confusion.
>>
>>If it's clearly a bad idea, please capture why on the list for later.
>>
>>RjS
>
>+ 0.5 to renaming it, if this helps us to come to a conclusion...

Henrik is better w/ words than I am, and he put forth my thoughts well.

How about: just allowing <br>, but the renderer decides what to do with it?
(Or is that an even worse solution wrt to "least surprise")

/Miek

--
Miek Gieben