IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.54, <table>

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Tue, 09 October 2018 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB08E1277CC for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e3F_LSXxskRF for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68B5128CE4 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (192.168.1.162) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.1.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:17:30 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Heather Flanagan' <rse@rfc-editor.org>, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
References: <70ee4cff-7533-13e0-d71a-ffecf2dc56f0@gmx.de> <24828f94-dbbd-4c18-8d85-333487bda367@levkowetz.com> <3ac63652-2df2-03c7-eee6-bad2cbd326d8@levkowetz.com> <B63F3A7C-AAB6-4281-BC5F-BC28E9693E43@icann.org> <2ab7b797-4a01-5327-10fb-5ae13587944f@nostrum.com> <a9cbe9b1-1ee4-b60b-bb88-d07d11afa6a3@gmx.de> <20181004192423.xexbgomdqs56pkok@miek.nl> <5694D337-A88C-4F3E-AE2D-8EA34C3A5A93@icann.org> <20181004193939.szec4ng47kp7lapv@miek.nl> <38897ac0-44a7-6b03-4e7e-e19a115fc53d@gmx.de> <f36e6a80-99ad-fd1a-f872-9b8fc83fb763@levkowetz.com> <050c01d45d97$714e51b0$53eaf510$@augustcellars.com> <efc18e10-416f-91ae-bff5-f7ecf2721df4@levkowetz.com> <052b01d45daa$87e71980$97b54c80$@augustcellars.com> <656afb2e-3aa7-53c5-5e39-55050387aa20@levkowetz.com> <0bac2940-1abc-87e3-35e7-f6d621e83f1c@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <0bac2940-1abc-87e3-35e7-f6d621e83f1c@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 11:22:03 -0700
Message-ID: <073e01d45ffc$fc161550$f4423ff0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQKlc/I8qUpx6H6sTpIQv3vHmEIb5gGMQXb8AverSrcCvXax5QHGvedgAOtPwScCpgcF3ADkS5KAAqj1aRQB/yc3qAHvHWwdAnFKOwwCPeYpeAHzzxMrAbzXacsBRDvT8qKHSWug
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.162]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/nXeP7aeHEqgTuwW0lFJ-dDO5h0Q>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.54, <table>
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 18:22:21 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml2rfc-dev <xml2rfc-dev-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Heather
> Flanagan
> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 11:01 AM
> To: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In
> Section 2.54, <table>
> 
> 
> On 10/6/18 2:53 PM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> > On 2018-10-06 21:26, Jim Schaad wrote:
> >>>> What is the rule you have for doing the alignment of figure
> >>>> captions? I think that the same rules should apply to both figures
> >>>> and tables.
> >>> Till now, both have been centered.  That can be changed.
> >>>
> >> No, I would not change this.  I would keep the centering for the
> >> caption.  The next interesting question the caption is wider than the
> >> table should it be wrapped to the table width or run on past the edge
> >> of the table.  I don't think that I have a preference
> > I don't (at least currently) have a strong preference.  The current
> > code wraps the title to fit within the table width.
> >
> 
> I'm not entirely sure how this issue differs from the table alignment
discussed
> in issues 40 and 9?

The first was where do you place the table on the page.  This one is how do
you place the caption in the table.

Jim

> 
> -Heather
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xml2rfc-dev mailing list
> xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email