Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.54, <table>
Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Sat, 20 October 2018 04:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E96130E29 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-pHFHqy2EAY for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02FC3130E25 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (192.168.1.162) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.1.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:08:54 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Henrik Levkowetz' <henrik@levkowetz.com>, 'Paul Hoffman' <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
CC: 'Heather Flanagan' <rse@rfc-editor.org>, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
References: <70ee4cff-7533-13e0-d71a-ffecf2dc56f0@gmx.de> <3ac63652-2df2-03c7-eee6-bad2cbd326d8@levkowetz.com> <B63F3A7C-AAB6-4281-BC5F-BC28E9693E43@icann.org> <2ab7b797-4a01-5327-10fb-5ae13587944f@nostrum.com> <a9cbe9b1-1ee4-b60b-bb88-d07d11afa6a3@gmx.de> <20181004192423.xexbgomdqs56pkok@miek.nl> <5694D337-A88C-4F3E-AE2D-8EA34C3A5A93@icann.org> <20181004193939.szec4ng47kp7lapv@miek.nl> <38897ac0-44a7-6b03-4e7e-e19a115fc53d@gmx.de> <f36e6a80-99ad-fd1a-f872-9b8fc83fb763@levkowetz.com> <050c01d45d97$714e51b0$53eaf510$@augustcellars.com> <efc18e10-416f-91ae-bff5-f7ecf2721df4@levkowetz.com> <052b01d45daa$87e71980$97b54c80$@augustcellars.com> <656afb2e-3aa7-53c5-5e39-55050387aa20@levkowetz.com> <0bac2940-1abc-87e3-35e7-f6d621e83f1c@rfc-editor.org> <073e01d45ffc$fc161550$f4423ff0$@augustcellars.com> <d90ce312-8580-5509-d876-3fe889d9b125@levkowetz.com> <2061F6E4-3DF8-4C60-BB35-AB52FCD98EB1@icann.org> <013601d46827$fc2b0cc0$f4812640$@augustcellars.com> <967ba0b0-3f72-028b-c050-015184394861@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <967ba0b0-3f72-028b-c050-015184394861@levkowetz.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:13:34 -0700
Message-ID: <014501d4682b$464f1fa0$d2ed5ee0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQKlc/I8qUpx6H6sTpIQv3vHmEIb5gL3q0q3Ar12seUBxr3nYADrT8EnAqYHBdwA5EuSgAKo9WkUAf8nN6gB7x1sHQJxSjsMAj3mKXgB888TKwG812nLAUQ70/IC5G2ZCgIYbD9VArGZRzMCchLzIwIQSEDAokKBi8A=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.162]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/Dha1XbNWWdl4hZpES-SqLmlOn3A>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.54, <table>
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 04:13:44 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 8:54 PM > To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>; 'Paul Hoffman' > <paul.hoffman@icann.org> > Cc: 'Heather Flanagan' <rse@rfc-editor.org>; xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Ext] [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In > Section 2.54, <table> > > Hi Jim, > > On 2018-10-20 05:50, Jim Schaad wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> > >> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 6:33 PM > >> To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> > >> Cc: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>; Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc- > >> editor.org>; xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org > >> Subject: Re: [Ext] [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, > >> RFC > > 7991, In > >> Section 2.54, <table> > >> > >> Sorry to reopen, but I'm not clear on the result. We have consensus > >> on something, but I'm not clear how to implement it. > >> > >> > >> On Oct 9, 2018, at 11:26 AM, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On 2018-10-09 20:22, Jim Schaad wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> -----Original Message----- > >> >>> From: xml2rfc-dev <xml2rfc-dev-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of > >> >>> Heather Flanagan > >> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 11:01 AM > >> >>> To: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org > >> >>> Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, RFC > >> >>> 7991, > > In > >> >>> Section 2.54, <table> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On 10/6/18 2:53 PM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > >> >>>> On 2018-10-06 21:26, Jim Schaad wrote: > >> >>>>>>> What is the rule you have for doing the alignment of figure > >> >>>>>>> captions? I think that the same rules should apply to both > >> >>>>>>> figures and tables. > >> >>>>>> Till now, both have been centered. That can be changed. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> No, I would not change this. I would keep the centering for > >> >>>>> the caption. The next interesting question the caption is > >> >>>>> wider than > > the > >> >>>>> table should it be wrapped to the table width or run on past > >> >>>>> the > > edge > >> >>>>> of the table. I don't think that I have a preference > >> >>>> I don't (at least currently) have a strong preference. The > >> >>>> current code wraps the title to fit within the table width. > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> I'm not entirely sure how this issue differs from the table > >> >>> alignment > >> >> discussed > >> >>> in issues 40 and 9? > >> >> > >> >> The first was where do you place the table on the page. This one > >> >> is > > how do > >> >> you place the caption in the table. > >> > > >> > Much more succinct than my reply :-) > >> > >> Is the result to simply add text that says "the caption will appear > > centered", or > >> is the result to add a new attribute such as "alignCaption" with the > > default > >> being "center". > > > > I think that this is just text and no new attributes. "The caption > > will appear centered and the same width as the table." > > That's the way I've implemented it, but I have a reservation for the case when > the table is very narrow. I'd prefer to leave the tool writer some wriggle room > for that case, and not prescribe that the caption must be the same width as the > table. I agree with that - every time that I have written this I have always had to think twice. Jim > > Best regards, > > Henrik >
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issue, R… henrik
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Miek Gieben
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Jim Schaad
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: RFC 7991 issue #37: S… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Jim Schaad
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: RFC 7991 issue #37: S… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: RFC 7991 issue #37: S… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schem… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schem… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schem… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schem… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schem… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Robert Sparks
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Miek Gieben
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: RFC 7991 issue #37: S… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: RFC 7991 issue #37: S… Miek Gieben
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: RFC 7991 issue #37: S… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: RFC 7991 issue #37: S… Miek Gieben
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: RFC 7991 issue #37: S… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: RFC 7991 issue #37: S… Julian Reschke
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Heather Flanagan
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… Heather Flanagan
- [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, R… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issu… Jim Schaad
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issu… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issu… Jim Schaad
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issu… Heather Flanagan
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issu… Jim Schaad
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issu… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schem… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schem… Jim Schaad
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schem… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schem… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schem… Jim Schaad
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schem… Heather Flanagan
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: RFC 7991 issue #37: S… HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issu… HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] Re: RFC 7991 issue #37: S… Henrik Levkowetz