Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.54, <table>

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Sat, 20 October 2018 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE9B130E01 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HqbUBBod9Iiw for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BD11130DE7 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:33:05 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:33:05 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
CC: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>, "xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org" <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.54, <table>
Thread-Index: AQHUaBTZuPxGuz8mPkGpbuZ+7Nn5JA==
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 01:33:05 +0000
Message-ID: <2061F6E4-3DF8-4C60-BB35-AB52FCD98EB1@icann.org>
References: <70ee4cff-7533-13e0-d71a-ffecf2dc56f0@gmx.de> <24828f94-dbbd-4c18-8d85-333487bda367@levkowetz.com> <3ac63652-2df2-03c7-eee6-bad2cbd326d8@levkowetz.com> <B63F3A7C-AAB6-4281-BC5F-BC28E9693E43@icann.org> <2ab7b797-4a01-5327-10fb-5ae13587944f@nostrum.com> <a9cbe9b1-1ee4-b60b-bb88-d07d11afa6a3@gmx.de> <20181004192423.xexbgomdqs56pkok@miek.nl> <5694D337-A88C-4F3E-AE2D-8EA34C3A5A93@icann.org> <20181004193939.szec4ng47kp7lapv@miek.nl> <38897ac0-44a7-6b03-4e7e-e19a115fc53d@gmx.de> <f36e6a80-99ad-fd1a-f872-9b8fc83fb763@levkowetz.com> <050c01d45d97$714e51b0$53eaf510$@augustcellars.com> <efc18e10-416f-91ae-bff5-f7ecf2721df4@levkowetz.com> <052b01d45daa$87e71980$97b54c80$@augustcellars.com> <656afb2e-3aa7-53c5-5e39-55050387aa20@levkowetz.com> <0bac2940-1abc-87e3-35e7-f6d621e83f1c@rfc-editor.org> <073e01d45ffc$fc161550$f4423ff0$@augustcellars.com> <d90ce312-8580-5509-d876-3fe889d9b125@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <d90ce312-8580-5509-d876-3fe889d9b125@levkowetz.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_03740569-7E7E-490C-8A74-3A639B24DB08"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/IZAeQkKn4NRTl4MY_fCejS_DEeo>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] [Ext] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.54, <table>
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 01:33:10 -0000

Sorry to reopen, but I'm not clear on the result. We have consensus on something, but I'm not clear how to implement it.


On Oct 9, 2018, at 11:26 AM, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 2018-10-09 20:22, Jim Schaad wrote:
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: xml2rfc-dev <xml2rfc-dev-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Heather
>>> Flanagan
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 11:01 AM
>>> To: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #31: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In
>>> Section 2.54, <table>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10/6/18 2:53 PM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
>>>> On 2018-10-06 21:26, Jim Schaad wrote:
>>>>>>> What is the rule you have for doing the alignment of figure
>>>>>>> captions? I think that the same rules should apply to both figures
>>>>>>> and tables.
>>>>>> Till now, both have been centered.  That can be changed.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> No, I would not change this.  I would keep the centering for the
>>>>> caption.  The next interesting question the caption is wider than the
>>>>> table should it be wrapped to the table width or run on past the edge
>>>>> of the table.  I don't think that I have a preference
>>>> I don't (at least currently) have a strong preference.  The current
>>>> code wraps the title to fit within the table width.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm not entirely sure how this issue differs from the table alignment
>> discussed
>>> in issues 40 and 9?
>> 
>> The first was where do you place the table on the page.  This one is how do
>> you place the caption in the table.
> 
> Much more succinct than my reply :-)

Is the result to simply add text that says "the caption will appear centered", or is the result to add a new attribute such as "alignCaption" with the default being "center".

If the latter, should this same new attribute be added to <figure> as well?

--Paul