Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.12, <br>

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 04 October 2018 06:43 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAF4130DE6 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 23:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fBLVzgygjO5U for <xml2rfc-dev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 23:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15BF4130DC6 for <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 23:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([91.61.61.129]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mfn40-1gK6PL2l6q-00NA6z; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 08:42:23 +0200
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([91.61.61.129]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mfn40-1gK6PL2l6q-00NA6z; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 08:42:23 +0200
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, "xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org" <xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
References: <E1g6wQ8-00057n-85@durif.tools.ietf.org> <70ee4cff-7533-13e0-d71a-ffecf2dc56f0@gmx.de> <24828f94-dbbd-4c18-8d85-333487bda367@levkowetz.com> <3ac63652-2df2-03c7-eee6-bad2cbd326d8@levkowetz.com> <1BA3E011-CEB3-4F56-9CB5-599C6D2D8A5D@icann.org> <2a71916e-4704-ef8c-b9bb-0cda1781c706@levkowetz.com> <2a06b7c8-5a84-60eb-c96e-25d07c61d67f@gmx.de> <4b49045f-49d7-2b01-bb57-087f8e014e5b@levkowetz.com> <32ef6fd2-058a-c44a-5129-26cd22343943@gmx.de> <a3d0816e-6cc0-dd11-9370-b391e3e71010@levkowetz.com> <c122b751-119d-9a10-a2b6-af90b140cfc8@gmx.de> <6c9785df-73c0-78ff-0c69-1ea1b369b0e0@levkowetz.com> <766a8834-4e7a-e819-6b76-2682eb99be9e@gmx.de> <81f488c3-1caf-a7cc-dc38-c39b3ca2ba5a@levkowetz.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <ff3ee47e-7c8e-5f83-55f9-a7c874b13de4@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 08:42:18 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <81f488c3-1caf-a7cc-dc38-c39b3ca2ba5a@levkowetz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:67EnLqxP3XinxMI0STbBJeLmCy+9UKl95psQ/CkQCVbKGg3UMrq rpYU+JK5CyEBu7LIqKKm8bfpRHnEncBvHGMqoatMoHE9zkAF6Dv+WiiQ+XfDLu74a50Qzhq e5y4swamP82oIfMAX/jdgsfvQCSnoiWhfWKpejgTCphkiI8N/XQeybHdwiDyxampPRx99Cu g+jp4K/2VC1LOhkMgh73w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Qu1W1wxfH3E=:aCqeRNLT0ZYLqwoy9+OuaF GjZR67XT/eOqkDb2hBmOUgCOyTPZKcju2cY3/Gq/TRzA++4L2t/qvazLsxHq8joNkTAEYmfeH jBt2u1ZuBxW2mZ3VahQpT/3m3+ckOz73h0O/cxyASgTl6t+km3RT+C7Rhs3/eW2Ah/TgWFZvM E2ZHq976ae+QcYD78fN8F4fR5Ij7cMEyEL59VTeB0q+0omcwQ69TXBNcjt4573MEvCnAweXHm TmkwJUQaxMx5isY9kxmleyQGQQPDpi1u9ySYG5V8YcPs6m2guILZ/TstuU8M5MXVIxGRbR18T Q4zcV76YHF9luG3YGt7Qbi4Jvv7xuor/bi/2vJgHKIN61mcJCjSxiN2xY6KQr6HbaXDJQoV/D T7F24LxbjfzQB/h0lfS+sOAv5nJi8L8cPDvON0K5JTSjVH2PyXq+OTI6CY2TOaVZ4Yq5l/uiU +PObgn+wO2Dts38Zm49aTXjYKQUqcRR6WQpZEgrbQCBLIBR6f1+iVzWrfXwXjj2Xm41iBVz2L op681wBNaT+p+5QUkZ1/K7n5ZnkeVftgXvTV3c3Lg636to1x5+oKlYigpcqCNhL0R/+2tRk/x DXn+uz6kHoJLb+GIK3xWAbhGIuBg5ODKeC/hX70+6YV0tlRpn3y7kVEsohIAOcIIUfBgmX8HY /scLkQNb6JvkvzLH2N1fGAhGG/fXmyKh2aN4r9hp7vIsDetpemzhXAG65H5L0e6Nr4YE5b0lr JoQf7YXg5y2JcrYTQVQXPTbKMqX7p9Sj3lhEiR2P313B88YgMgAw+OduKfEVF+pDK28vfctDG n/grMpCZbr7VqyX7tJlIuOddF0rxgz8w5SDPrFAgzEMBRGQ7tU=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xml2rfc-dev/EiiMPMwGmQOIqMOKlPqVgCfuqgs>
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc-dev] RFC 7991 issue #37: Schema Issue, RFC 7991, In Section 2.12, <br>
X-BeenThere: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about particulars of xml2rfc V3 design, development and code." <xml2rfc-dev.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc-dev>, <mailto:xml2rfc-dev-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 06:43:02 -0000

On 10/4/2018 1:48 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> .. >> Example, please?
> 
> Umm?  Take the table you pointed at, give each header cell rowspan="2",
> except the cell(s) where you want a particular line break, and put the
> first part in the first cell and the second part in the second cell.

That would require the table style to have little margins and no 
horizontal lines. (the lack of table styling features is another issue).

> ... >> In the past, we have worked around that by using non-breaking spaces
>> where we want to keep things together. I doubt that the same approach
>> would work well in narrow table cells...
> 
> Why not?  There's no mathematical difference between the two cases.

Because then you'd get overflows when the cell gets narrower than the 
longest character sequence that can't be broken. This is not an issue 
for the doc title, because it has lots of room.

> ...

Best regards, Julian