Re: [6lowpan] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-15
"Noriyuki SATO" <sato652@oki.com> Tue, 08 March 2011 08:05 UTC
Return-Path: <sato652@oki.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B9E3A691E for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:05:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id je3DN7UD4LVW for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:05:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gwf2.oki.co.jp (gwf2.oki.co.jp [202.226.91.187]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D543A6915 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:05:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gwf2.oki.co.jp (Postfix, from userid 0) id DB41CCF996; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:06:16 +0900 (JST)
Received: from s111h121.dm1.oii.oki.co.jp [172.26.101.121] by gwf2.oki.co.jp with ESMTP id TAA24978; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:06:16 +0900
Received: from s111h121.dm1.oii.oki.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10B639800A; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:06:13 +0900 (JST)
Received: from s24c40.dm1.oii.oki.co.jp (s24c40.dm1.oii.oki.co.jp [172.26.76.90]) by s111h121.dm1.oii.oki.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7187398003; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:06:13 +0900 (JST)
Received: from PC26276 (wl14.kansai.oki.co.jp [10.173.11.14]) by s24c40.dm1.oii.oki.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF75225F6D7; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 17:06:13 +0900 (JST)
From: Noriyuki SATO <sato652@oki.com>
To: 'Carsten Bormann' <cabo@tzi.org>, '6lowpan' <6lowpan@ietf.org>
References: <79D3D27D-F813-4773-8289-F973AB01F743@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 17:06:13 +0900
Message-ID: <47DC4CBC524B442BBAAE1E8F992FA13B@power.oki.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AcvOu2IVtv0C1Z+MQS+JwnfuVL4UdgOqeqcg
In-Reply-To: <79D3D27D-F813-4773-8289-F973AB01F743@tzi.org>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-15
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:05:01 -0000
Hi all, This is just a question rather than a comment since the WGLC period is already over and a matter is really old one. I thought the old draft (before 08 or 07) has a concept of a conjunction of the mesh under and the route over. However, it looks to me the current draft implicit that there isn't a concept like that anymore. (Ex. Route over runs among LRs and each LR has mesh under network individually.) Am I missing something? Or the document still allows it? Apologize if the WG already has a consent regarding this. --- OKI Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Noriyuki Sato (sato652@oki.com) Tel +81-6-6260-0700 Fax +81-6-6260-0770 -----Original Message----- From: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:58 AM To: 6lowpan Subject: [6lowpan] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-15 In September/October, we had the first WGLC on 6LoWPAN-ND, which resulted in a number of detailed comments and two resulting fine-tuning iterations of the draft. draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-15.txt has been out for two months now. I understand it has taken part in several interops with multiple implementations in this period; no issues came up. We now start the Working Group Last Call on: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-15 The document is planned to be submitted by this Working Group to the IESG for publication as a Standards-Track Document. This is a two-week Working-Group Last-Call, ending on Thursday, 2011-03-03 at 2359 UTC. Please review the changes to the document carefully once more, and send your comments to the 6lowpan list. Please also do indicate to the list if you are all-OK with the document. Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list 6lowpan@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Mukul Goyal
- [6lowpan] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lowpan] Working Group Last call for draft-i… Don Sturek
- Re: [6lowpan] Working Group Last call for draft-i… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- [6lowpan] -nd-15: DAD requirement seems too strict Anders Brandt
- [6lowpan] -nd-15: Joining the all-nodes multicast… Anders Brandt
- [6lowpan] -nd-15: Battery host support seems to b… Anders Brandt
- [6lowpan] -nd-15: Purpose of SLLA slightly unclear Anders Brandt
- [6lowpan] 6lowPAN HC in context of draft-thubert-… Anders Brandt
- Re: [6lowpan] -nd-15: Joining the all-nodes multi… Colin O'Flynn
- Re: [6lowpan] -nd-15: Joining the all-nodes multi… Anders Brandt
- Re: [6lowpan] -nd-15: DAD requirement seems too s… Colin O'Flynn
- Re: [6lowpan] -nd-15: DAD requirement seems too s… Anders Brandt
- Re: [6lowpan] -nd-15: Battery host support seems … Mukul Goyal
- Re: [6lowpan] Working Group Last call for draft-i… Dijk, Esko
- [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Mukul Goyal
- Re: [6lowpan] Working Group Last call for draft-i… Mathieu Goessens
- Re: [6lowpan] Working Group Last call for draft-i… Noriyuki SATO
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Mukul Goyal
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Erik Nordmark
- Re: [6lowpan] -nd-15: Joining the all-nodes multi… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Dijk, Esko
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Carsten Bormann
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Mukul Goyal
- Re: [6lowpan] -nd-15: Joining the all-nodes multi… Erik Nordmark
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Anders Brandt
- [6lowpan] How to find the mailbox? (related to "A… Anders Brandt
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Dijk, Esko
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6lowpan] How to find the mailbox? (related t… Richard Kelsey
- Re: [6lowpan] How to find the mailbox? (related t… Jonathan Hui
- Re: [6lowpan] How to find the mailbox? (related t… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6lowpan] How to find the mailbox? (related t… Noriyuki SATO
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Erik Nordmark
- Re: [6lowpan] "Advertize on Behalf" flag in ARO Erik Nordmark