IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [87attendees] IETF wireless

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Fri, 09 August 2013 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B07721F862B for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.597, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ml+oY7qL6GQT for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2607211E8135 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6FE749C; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 20:20:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FB99A; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 20:20:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 20:20:30 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Chris Elliott <chelliot@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO_RpcLgiCsSaPr3iLLCUivqzvdVWxwcXGSt5mgx7nQ+aS35Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308092019180.5289@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|a98bd69aea4959b1596d153ba8019962p74AmS03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <CAGhGL2Bagjn3v0xwCLKVy0z7nhybRogn+voZBxQVOMNztqOkoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO_RpcLgiCsSaPr3iLLCUivqzvdVWxwcXGSt5mgx7nQ+aS35Lg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: "87attendees@ietf.org attendees" <87attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] IETF wireless
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 18:28:00 -0000

On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Chris Elliott wrote:

> evaluation and the technical recommendations on the suitability of 
> venues to host the network you all know and love is taken very 
> seriously, and has nixed many venues.

How do the venues react when they hear that they're being rejected on 
these grounds?

I'm still hoping network connectivity is going to not just be a cost 
center for venues going forward, but so far it seems it's still a checkbox 
feature that isn't taken very seriously.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email