IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [87attendees] IETF wireless

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Mon, 05 August 2013 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15E321F9ABB for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 04:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.201, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OgK67coTtPyC for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B721321F940D for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 04:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1162; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375702803; x=1376912403; h=date:from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=VVDuCrYujfForQwntQRTi60ULMzMlhAdz7MTaRXuSDQ=; b=e0I+PWruVwq0zIhpuFUOxPEH+ZrQp8786IyVz5wGHh7rYHFo4xfvwGha xspme8ETPrRxnYG+dL1LhpFNIXpjKHCO3tCZZUFcWZivuW633ojywwXFx 93yJa11BSK/+EHcYyZFKw28JRmNoQxmdv9ceo7+iKZtMthUWHrAj0pX2K w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAKiO/1GrRDoG/2dsb2JhbABXAw6CeDUBv0OBHxZ0giQBAQEDAQEBATc0CwULCw44JzAGExuHbwUNtGOOYYEoEAcRg3wDiSqUW4YGhSSCWV4cgTU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,817,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="85356185"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2013 11:40:03 +0000
Received: from [10.27.1.132] (sjc-ole-8913.cisco.com [10.27.1.132]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r75Be26Q009581 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:40:02 GMT
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 04:40:02 -0700
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|a98bd69aea4959b1596d153ba8019962p74AmS03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1308050439080.146@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
References: <767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|a98bd69aea4959b1596d153ba8019962p74AmS03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: "87attendees@ietf.org attendees" <87attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] IETF wireless
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 11:40:09 -0000

Check out the NOC report which was referenced (but not delivered) 
during the plenary on Wednesday. The info you ask for is usually
contained therein.

Ole


Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
Skype: organdemo


On Mon, 5 Aug 2013, Tim Chown wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Others have given the wireless network at this IETF due praise.  
> Indeed the wireless has been excellent for many IETFs now, such that 
> we pretty much take it for granted.  Well done to everyone involved.
> 
> Is there any information available on the solution that was 
> delivered?  From memory the APs were Cisco Aironet, but it would be 
> interesting to know about density, controllers, etc.  Usage info, 
> especially for IPv6, would be interesting too.
> 
> If the info isn't available, so be it, but it might be of interest 
> to many...
> 
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> 87attendees mailing list
> 87attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email