Re: [87attendees] IETF wireless

Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> Mon, 05 August 2013 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rpelletier@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E0821F9371 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 13:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ejIYjxz2esZ5 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 13:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp105.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp105.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.105]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A1321F9ECA for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 13:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id DDE5C980D2; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:24:32 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp6.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: rpelletier-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id A5AA6981D4; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:24:32 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|a98bd69aea4959b1596d153ba8019962p74AmS03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:24:34 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <66063568-4B70-4F73-9816-192613C6742A@isoc.org>
References: <767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|a98bd69aea4959b1596d153ba8019962p74AmS03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: "87attendees@ietf.org attendees" <87attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [87attendees] IETF wireless
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 20:24:38 -0000

On Aug 5, 2013, at 5:48 AM, Tim Chown wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Others have given the wireless network at this IETF due praise.  Indeed the wireless has been excellent for many IETFs now, such that we pretty much take it for granted.  Well done to everyone involved.
> 
> Is there any information available on the solution that was delivered?  From memory the APs were Cisco Aironet, but it would be interesting to know about density, controllers, etc.  Usage info, especially for IPv6, would be interesting too.
> 
> If the info isn't available, so be it, but it might be of interest to many...

The NOC report is at the Proceedings already:  https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/87/materials.html

Ray



> 
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> 87attendees mailing list
> 87attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees