IETF Logo Mail Archive

[87attendees] IETF wireless

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 05 August 2013 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF80721F8528 for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 02:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KXYfdE+cP6vQ for <87attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 02:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3C821F8C0C for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 02:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r759mSw2032644 for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 10:48:28 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk r759mSw2032644
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1375696108; bh=1CGhPfl+ee0w7tSg8XCwt8hhF6k=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:Mime-Version:References; b=themeX0gLMUv7zl4//gV97Znt2VX2mw/hpnsZyYcRt2qDJ1+BnKmL9no7bD55l/Bp mZ6AW79sxhx9XemrKqy5t/DtiSkjHZQkMYXx4yfXk1auzkiGiqlRnXRbT4d4Kb3tfj CV3cSq3Ofd4z2caSrA+OAisK5wotFq1ldL4wdNfg=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id p74AmS0544538890By ret-id none; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:48:28 +0100
Received: from dhcp-205-22.wireless.soton.ac.uk (dhcp-205-22.wireless.soton.ac.uk [152.78.205.22] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r759mPG3022867 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <87attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 10:48:25 +0100
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|a98bd69aea4959b1596d153ba8019962p74AmS03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:48:25 +0100
To: "87attendees@ietf.org attendees" <87attendees@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=p74AmS054453889000; tid=p74AmS0544538890By; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
References: <767558DB-5546-4361-862E-0342F02AD435@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: r759mSw2032644
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [87attendees] IETF wireless
X-BeenThere: 87attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <87attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/87attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:87attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/87attendees>, <mailto:87attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 09:49:12 -0000

Hi,

Others have given the wireless network at this IETF due praise.  Indeed the wireless has been excellent for many IETFs now, such that we pretty much take it for granted.  Well done to everyone involved.

Is there any information available on the solution that was delivered?  From memory the APs were Cisco Aironet, but it would be interesting to know about density, controllers, etc.  Usage info, especially for IPv6, would be interesting too.

If the info isn't available, so be it, but it might be of interest to many...

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email